[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"blog-article-trixie-bet-vs-patent-en":3,"mdc-stmjts-key":69},{"id":4,"slug":5,"status":6,"section":7,"category":8,"author":9,"publish_date":10,"read_time":11,"image":12,"embedded_components":13,"related_calculators":13,"related_articles":14,"title":15,"description":16,"keywords":17,"content":26,"faq":27,"availableLocales":64},"6214767f-452d-4312-affd-d7cd8c4a585a","trixie-bet-vs-patent","published","betting","guides","Evgeniy Volkov","2026-04-24",12,"\u002Fimages\u002Fblog\u002Ftrixie-bet-vs-patent.webp","[]",[],"Trixie Bet vs Patent: The 4-vs-7 Bet Breakdown (2026)","Trixie bet vs Patent — what 3 singles add to a 3-selection slip and when the extra £3 stake is worth it. Free system bet tool (2026).",[18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25],"trixie bet vs patent","trixie vs patent","difference between trixie and patent","trixie bet explained","patent bet explained","trixie bet cost","patent bet cost","3 selection system bet","# Trixie Bet vs Patent: The 4-vs-7 Bet Breakdown (2026)\n\nPicture this: you're standing at the betting counter, slip in hand, three horses picked out for the Saturday card. Your mate leans over and says \"do a Trixie — four bets, cheaper.\" The guy behind you in the queue disagrees: \"nah, go Patent, you get something back on just one winner.\" One of them is right for your slate, one of them is wrong, and the answer depends on numbers almost no pub debate ever actually runs.\n\nThat single difference — 4 bets versus 7 bets on the same 3 selections — is the whole Trixie vs Patent argument in 2026. A Trixie at £1 per line costs £4 total. A Patent at £1 per line costs £7 total. The extra £3 buys you exactly one thing: three singles on your picks, which means a Patent pays out on just 1 winner where a Trixie needs 2. Whether that £3 premium is worth paying comes down to per-leg odds, confidence, and whether the bookmaker is dangling a single-winner bonus.\n\nIf you just want a calculator, skip straight to our [universal system bet calculator](\u002Fbetting\u002Fsystem-bet-calculator) — it handles Trixie, Patent, each-way, Rule 4, bonuses, everything. This guide exists for understanding *when* that calculator's answer says \"take the Patent\" and when it says \"save the £3.\"\n\n## TL;DR — Quick Summary\n\nA Trixie is 4 bets (3 doubles + 1 treble) on 3 selections. A Patent is 7 bets (3 singles + 3 doubles + 1 treble) on the same 3 selections. The Patent adds the 3 singles a Trixie deliberately leaves out. That singles layer costs £3 extra per £1 per line and lets the Patent pay out on just 1 winner, where a Trixie needs at least 2.\n\n### The 4-vs-7 Breakdown at a Glance\n\n| Bet type | Lines | £1 per line cost | Min winners for any return |\n|----------|:-----:|:----------------:|:--------------------------:|\n| Trixie | 4 | £4 | 2 |\n| Patent | 7 | £7 | 1 |\n| **Difference** | **+3 singles** | **+£3 (+75%)** | **−1 winner** |\n\n### When Each One Wins\n\n- **Pick a Trixie** when per-leg odds are below 2.5 and you're confident 2+ picks will win. The singles layer of a Patent doesn't earn its £3 premium at short prices.\n- **Pick a Patent** when per-leg odds are above 2.5 and you want the 1-winner safety net. At longer odds the 3 singles produce positive expected value on their own.\n- **Pick neither** when you're highly confident in all 3 picks — a straight treble at £4 stake compounds harder than either system bet.\n\nIf the system bet concept itself is fresh, [this explainer on what a system bet is](\u002Fblog\u002Fwhat-is-a-system-bet-explained) walks through the basics in under five minutes.\n\n## How a Trixie and a Patent Are Built\n\nBoth bets look identical on a betting slip: three selections, one bet type selected, one stake entered. The difference is entirely in what lines the bookmaker generates under the hood. Understanding the 4-vs-7 anatomy explains why the Patent costs 75% more and why that extra cost does specific work.\n\n### The Trixie: 4 Lines, No Singles\n\nA Trixie takes your 3 picks — call them A, B, and C — and builds:\n\n1. **Double A+B** — both legs must win\n2. **Double A+C** — both legs must win\n3. **Double B+C** — both legs must win\n4. **Treble A+B+C** — all three must win\n\nCount: 3 doubles + 1 treble = 4 lines. That's every way to pair your selections plus the one way to combine all three. No singles. If just 1 pick wins, every line contains at least one loser and the full £4 stake dies.\n\nThe Trixie is what bookmakers call a \"full-cover bet without singles.\" The \"full cover\" means every possible multi-combination from 2 up to all selections; the \"without singles\" is the £3 saving over the Patent.\n\n### The Patent: 7 Lines With the Singles Layer\n\nA Patent takes the same 3 picks and builds:\n\n1. **Single A** — leg A wins\n2. **Single B** — leg B wins\n3. **Single C** — leg C wins\n4. **Double A+B**\n5. **Double A+C**\n6. **Double B+C**\n7. **Treble A+B+C**\n\nCount: 3 singles + 3 doubles + 1 treble = 7 lines. Every line from the Trixie is still there, plus the 3 singles on top. That's why the Patent is called a \"full-cover bet with singles.\"\n\nThe 3 singles are exactly what they sound like: one independent bet per selection, priced at that selection's odds alone. Win one, collect that single's return. Every extra winner unlocks more lines on top (doubles with the other winners, the treble if all three hit), but the singles always pay independently.\n\nFor the full combinatorial math behind these line counts, [the system bet calculation walkthrough](\u002Fblog\u002Fhow-to-calculate-system-bet) covers C(n,k) derivations for every popular format.\n\n### Why the Extra £3 Buys a Different Floor\n\nOn a £1-per-line stake the difference in total outlay is tiny in absolute terms — £4 versus £7 — but the structural difference is enormous. A Trixie has a floor of £0: zero winners or exactly 1 winner both return nothing. A Patent has a floor determined by your lowest-odds pick: even a single-winner slate returns at least the winning single's payout.\n\nThat's the fundamental Trixie vs Patent trade-off. You're not buying more \"potential upside\" with a Patent — both formats have identical maximum payouts when all 3 legs land, because the doubles and the treble are the same in both. You're buying a non-zero floor on bad slates.\n\n## Payout Scenarios: Winner by Winner (3 Selections at 3.0)\n\nThis is the section most competitor guides skip. Below are the exact payouts across all 4 possible outcomes on a 3-pick Trixie and Patent, each at per-leg odds of 3.0 with £1 per line stake. Trixie total stake £4, Patent total stake £7, before any bookmaker bonuses.\n\n### 0 Winners — Both Dead\n\nNo lines survive in either format. Every double, treble, and single (on the Patent) contains at least one loser.\n\n- Trixie: **£0 return on £4 stake = −£4 net**\n- Patent: **£0 return on £7 stake = −£7 net**\n\nObvious outcome: both full stakes lost. The Patent's £3 premium buys nothing here — no singles hit if no selections win.\n\n### 1 Winner — Where Patent Earns Its Keep\n\nExactly 1 of 3 selections wins. On a Trixie, every line contains at least one of the two losing legs and dies. On a Patent, the 2 singles on the losing legs die, but the 1 single on the winning leg survives.\n\n- Trixie: **£0 return on £4 stake = −£4 net**\n- Patent: 1 single × 3.0 × £1 = **£3 return on £7 stake = −£4 net**\n\nHere's the interesting part: both formats show a £4 net loss at per-leg odds of 3.0 on a 1-winner slate. The Patent returns £3 from the surviving single, but you paid £3 extra in stake to make that single exist, so the two cancel out. The real benefit of the Patent on 1-winner slates only kicks in when the per-leg odds are above 3.0 — the single's return exceeds the £3 extra stake, flipping the scenario from \"break-even vs Trixie\" to \"net better than Trixie.\"\n\n### 2 Winners — Trixie Starts Paying\n\nExactly 2 of 3 selections win. On both formats, the 1 double combining those two winners survives. On the Patent, 2 singles also survive. The treble dies in both cases.\n\n- Trixie: 1 double × 9.0 × £1 = **£9 return on £4 stake = +£5 net**\n- Patent: 2 singles × 3.0 × £1 = £6, plus 1 double × 9.0 × £1 = £9, total = **£15 return on £7 stake = +£8 net**\n\nBoth formats turn profitable at the 2-winner mark. The Patent shows a bigger absolute profit because of the 2 surviving singles, but the percentage return on stake is higher on the Trixie (£9 on £4 = 125%) than on the Patent (£15 on £7 = 114%). Efficiency vs absolute profit — the classic Trixie vs Patent trade-off in one line.\n\n### 3 Winners — Both Full Payout\n\nAll 3 selections win. Every line in both formats survives. Maximum payout scenario.\n\n- Trixie: 3 doubles × 9.0 × £1 + 1 treble × 27.0 × £1 = £27 + £27 = **£54 return on £4 stake = +£50 net**\n- Patent: 3 singles × 3.0 × £1 + 3 doubles × 9.0 × £1 + 1 treble × 27.0 × £1 = £9 + £27 + £27 = **£63 return on £7 stake = +£56 net**\n\nWith a typical 10% all-winners bonus applied, the Patent climbs to £69.30 (+£62.30 net) and the Trixie to £59.40 (+£55.40 net). The Patent has the bigger absolute number again, but the Trixie's return on stake (£54 on £4 = 1250%) crushes the Patent's (£63 on £7 = 900%). If you had £7 to spend and you knew all 3 picks would win, putting £1.75 per line on the Trixie (£7 total) would return £94.50 — more than the Patent's £63.\n\n### Visualising the Payout Curve\n\n::chart-trixie-vs-patent-returns\n::\n\nThe chart makes the 1-winner gap obvious: Patent has a non-zero floor from the surviving single, Trixie sits at £0. Every extra winner drives both payouts up steeply, but the gap between them narrows in percentage terms as winners accumulate. For a side-by-side comparison against straight accumulators on the same slates, [the system bet vs accumulator breakdown](\u002Fblog\u002Fsystem-bet-vs-accumulator) runs identical picks through both structures.\n\n## Trixie vs Patent: Break-Even Hit Rate Math\n\nMost Trixie vs Patent choices get made on feel. \"I feel good about all three, I'll take a Trixie\" or \"one of them's a bit iffy, let me hedge with a Patent.\" Feelings lose money. The actual expected value calculation is one line of algebra and it tells you exactly when the extra £3 of Patent singles pays for itself.\n\n### The Singles Layer EV Formula\n\nThe Patent's 3 singles each have expected value = probability × odds − 1 per £1 stake. Aggregated across the 3 singles layer at £1 per line:\n\n$$EV_{singles} = 3 \\times p \\times o - 3$$\n\nPlain English: multiply your per-leg hit rate by the odds, multiply by 3 singles, subtract the £3 total extra stake. If the result is positive, the singles layer has positive expected value and Patent beats Trixie over the long run. If negative, Trixie wins on cost efficiency.\n\nThe decisive condition simplifies to: `p × o > 1`. Per-leg probability times per-leg odds must exceed 1 for the Patent singles to pay for themselves.\n\n### When Patent Wins: Singles EV Positive\n\nAt fair odds with no bookmaker margin, the singles layer has positive EV whenever per-leg `p × o > 1`. Typical 2026 bookmaker overround is 105-110% on single markets, so you want `p × o > 1.05` or better to beat the vig.\n\nConcrete 2026 examples where Patent wins:\n\n- 3 picks at 3.0 odds and 40% hit rate: 0.40 × 3.0 = 1.20 → Patent wins (+20% EV on singles)\n- 3 picks at 4.0 odds and 30% hit rate: 0.30 × 4.0 = 1.20 → Patent wins (+20% EV)\n- 3 picks at 5.0 odds and 25% hit rate: 0.25 × 5.0 = 1.25 → Patent wins (+25% EV)\n- Any slip where the bookmaker offers a 3x single-winner bonus — flips EV sharply in Patent's favour even at shorter prices\n\n### When Trixie Wins: Singles EV Negative\n\nTrixie beats Patent on net EV when the singles layer has negative expected value: `p × o \u003C 1`. This happens on short-priced favourites where the bookmaker margin eats into the singles before the odds can compensate.\n\nConcrete 2026 examples where Trixie wins:\n\n- 3 picks at 1.8 odds and 50% hit rate: 0.50 × 1.8 = 0.90 → Trixie wins (singles bleed)\n- 3 picks at 2.0 odds and 45% hit rate: 0.45 × 2.0 = 0.90 → Trixie wins\n- Any \"safe\" 3-pick slate where every leg is priced below 2.2 — the £3 singles premium costs more than the singles return\n\n### The 2.0-Odds Pivot Point\n\nThere's a rough rule of thumb that falls out of the math: **below 2.0 per-leg odds, pick Trixie. Above 2.5 per-leg odds, pick Patent. Between 2.0 and 2.5, run the numbers.**\n\nThat pivot works because at exactly 2.0 odds with 50% hit rate, `p × o = 1.00` — the singles layer is pure break-even. Below 2.0 you need an unrealistically high hit rate to break the singles even; above 2.5 even moderate hit rates push the singles into profit. The 2.0-2.5 zone is the messy middle where bookmaker bonuses and specific selection confidence tip the scale.\n\nThis is the same structural trade-off as [Lucky 15 versus Yankee](\u002Fblog\u002Flucky-15-bet-explained) at 4 selections — in both cases, the version with singles wins at longer odds, the version without singles wins at shorter odds. The math is identical, just scaled.\n\n## When to Pick Trixie Over Patent (and Vice Versa)\n\nThe break-even formula is the mechanical answer. The practical decision also weighs bookmaker bonuses, confidence per leg, budget, and whether you're trying to build a bankroll or play for a single big day. Here's the full decision framework.\n\n### Pick a Trixie When\n\n- **Per-leg odds below 2.5** — the singles layer of a Patent bleeds at these prices, Trixie is the cheaper structure for the same double\u002Ftreble coverage\n- **You're confident 2+ of 3 picks will win** — Trixie's 2-winner break-even is lower at £4 stake than Patent's at £7 stake\n- **Your bookmaker doesn't offer Patent bonuses** — without a 2x-4x single-winner bonus, the Patent loses most of its structural edge\n- **You want the highest return on stake percentage** — Trixie's £4 total makes every pound work harder on any winning scenario\n- **You're comfortable with an all-or-nothing 1-winner outcome** — Trixie dies on 0 or 1 winners, Patent collects on 1\n\n### Pick a Patent When\n\n- **Per-leg odds above 2.5** — the 3 singles produce positive expected value on their own, earning the £3 premium\n- **You want a 1-winner safety net** — psychologically and practically, seeing *something* come back on a bad day keeps bankrolls alive\n- **Your bookmaker offers single-winner bonuses** — Paddy Power's 3x, Betfair's 4x on specific meetings can turn a small return into a real rescue\n- **You're budgeting for 0-2 winners as the most likely outcome** — on shaky slates, the Patent's singles layer is exactly what you're paying for\n- **You're teaching yourself Patent settlement** — a £0.70 10p-per-line Patent gives all the learning with minimal cost\n\n### The Bookmaker Bonus Shortcut\n\nThere's a shortcut buried in every Trixie vs Patent decision: the single-winner bonus. If your bookmaker offers a 3x bonus on a 1-winner Patent, your singles EV formula becomes `3 × p × 3o − 3`, which simplifies to `3 × p × o − 1`. The break-even hit rate for the Patent's singles layer drops from `p × o > 1` to roughly `p × o > 0.33` — you can take the Patent on much shorter-priced slates and still print.\n\nThose bonuses don't apply to every bookmaker, every slip, or every race type. Minimum odds restrictions, minimum runner counts, and each-way exclusions all apply. Always check the specific T&Cs before committing to a Patent on the bonus — a \"headline 4x bonus\" that actually requires 2.0+ odds per leg and 6+ runners can silently fail to trigger.\n\n## Each-Way, Rule 4, and Non-Runner Rules\n\nThe structural Trixie vs Patent decision is one layer. A second layer — each-way, Rule 4 deductions, and non-runner re-pricing — can shift the math for horse racing slates in 2026.\n\n### Each-Way Trixie vs Patent\n\nEach-way doubles the line count: Trixie goes from 4 to 8 lines, Patent from 7 to 14. The place portion pays at 1\u002F4 or 1\u002F5 of the win odds depending on the runner count and race type. A £1-each-way Trixie is £8 total outlay; a £1-each-way Patent is £14.\n\n#### When Each-Way Makes Sense\n\n- All 3 selections are priced 4.0 or higher (generous place terms apply)\n- Horse racing events with 8+ runners qualify for 1\u002F4 or 1\u002F5 place terms\n- You want a realistic chance of covering the increased stake on a bad day\n\n#### When Each-Way Fails\n\nEach-way does *not* make sense on football, tennis, or other sports without place markets, and it doesn't make sense on heavy favourites under 2.5 — the place portion returns too little to justify doubling the outlay. A £14 each-way Patent on 3 picks at 1.8 is almost pure dead weight. The 3 place-portion singles return close to stake regardless of whether the horse wins, places, or loses by a nose, and the doubles and treble on the place side barely compound.\n\n### Rule 4 Deductions\n\nRule 4 applies to UK horse racing when a runner is withdrawn after you place the bet. The bookmaker deducts a set amount per pound from winning returns on every line that included the affected race. A 20p Rule 4 on a line paying £10 means you collect £10 − £2 = £8.\n\nCritically, Rule 4 applies to both Trixie and Patent but affects different numbers of lines. On a Trixie, any race where a runner is withdrawn affects up to 3 lines (the 2 doubles and the treble containing that leg). On a Patent, the same withdrawal affects up to 4 lines (1 single, 2 doubles, 1 treble). That's why Patent returns can dip slightly more than Trixie returns in heavy-withdrawal meetings — more lines to deduct from.\n\n### Void Legs and Re-Pricing\n\nIf a selection is void (non-runner, game cancelled, race abandoned), the line containing that leg re-prices. On a Trixie, the treble becomes a double at the two surviving odds, and a double containing the voided leg collapses to a single on the remaining leg at face-value odds. On a Patent, additionally the single on the voided leg is refunded at stake.\n\nSome books apply the \"reduced-to-1.0\" rule instead, treating the void as a break-even multiplier. That rule makes the Patent's 1 refunded single more valuable (you get the stake back) but the Trixie loses slightly more structure because it has fewer surviving lines to fall back on. Check the bookmaker's T&Cs for the exact handling — William Hill, bet365 and Betfair all document this differently.\n\n## Common Trixie and Patent Mistakes\n\nEvery one of these mistakes appears in bookmaker transaction data. Trixie and Patent losers don't usually lose because the format is bad — they lose because of these specific errors.\n\n### Treating Per-Line Stake as Total Stake\n\nThe most common mistake on both formats. Every bookmaker asks for per-line stake (usually defaulting to £1), and the total outlay is that stake multiplied by 4 for a Trixie or 7 for a Patent. Punters new to these bets type \"£10\" thinking it means \"my total is £10,\" and see £40 or £70 deducted.\n\nEvery bookmaker confirms the total on the slip before submission — read the \"Total Stake\" field, not just the \"Stake\" field. If the total shocks you, cut your per-line stake before tapping confirm. The rule is dead simple: multiply your per-line number by 4 (Trixie) or 7 (Patent) in your head before pressing submit.\n\n### Picking Heavy Favourites Below 2.0\n\nThree selections at 1.50 on a £1 Patent: total stake £7, maximum return (all 3 win) = 3 × 1.5 + 3 × 2.25 + 1 × 3.375 = £14.63. Even with every pick landing, you clear £7.63 net on £7 outlay. Adjusted for bookmaker margin and the non-trivial risk of one \"safe\" pick losing, expected value is negative.\n\nHeavy favourites belong on a short treble or as separate singles, not a Trixie or Patent. The compounding benefit of doubles and the treble is too weak when individual odds are low, and the Patent's singles don't earn their £3 premium on prices below 2.0. The [Yankee calculator strategy guide](\u002Fblog\u002Fyankee-bet-calculator-strategy) shows the same pattern at 4 selections — longer odds favour more complex systems, short odds kill them.\n\n### Ignoring Bookmaker Bonus Fine Print\n\nThe 2x-4x single-winner bonus on a Patent looks amazing on paper, but the fine print usually excludes each-way bets, minimum runner counts, and \"non-runner no bet\" race types. Before committing to a Patent because of the headline bonus, check: does it apply to your specific selections? Is the minimum odds restriction 2.0 or 1.5? Are any races below the runner-count threshold?\n\nMissing these terms turns an expected +EV bonus into a standard payout — and on a bet sized for the bonus, that's a real financial hit. Model the Patent bonus scenarios before placing, so you see the actual return with and without the bonus triggered.\n\n### Using a Trixie on High-Odds Long Shots\n\nThe symmetric mistake to picking favourites on a Patent: using a Trixie on 3 picks priced 5.0+. At those odds the singles layer on a Patent is worth far more than £3, but the Trixie format leaves that money on the table. Three picks at 6.0 imply a 16.7% per-leg hit rate, and 0.167³ = 0.46% chance of all 3 landing. At those probabilities, you need the singles to catch any return at all — which is exactly what a Trixie doesn't have.\n\nRule of thumb: above per-leg odds of 4.0, consider abandoning the Trixie for the Patent (or even a Lucky 15 if you can stretch to 4 selections) because the singles layer is doing most of the EV work at that price band.\n\n## See Your Trixie vs Patent Payout: Interactive Explorer\n\nBelow is a stripped-down educational tool: pick three sample selections at 3.00 odds each, toggle them W\u002FL, and watch which of the Trixie's 4 lines and the Patent's 7 lines survive. It's not a full calculator — for that, use [our system bet tool](\u002Fbetting\u002Fsystem-bet-calculator). This one is designed to make the 1-winner Patent rescue visual.\n\n::inline-trixie-vs-patent-explorer\n::\n\n## When Lucky 15, Yankee, or a Straight Treble Makes More Sense\n\nTrixie and Patent are not always the right choice. Both wrap 3 selections, and sometimes 3 isn't the right size of slate. Here's when to reach for a different format entirely.\n\n### Go Bigger: Lucky 15 or Yankee at 4 Selections\n\nIf you have 4 strong picks instead of 3, the 4-selection equivalents (Lucky 15 and Yankee) unlock more combinations. A Yankee is to a Trixie what Lucky 15 is to a Patent — same structural trade-off, one size up. With 4 selections:\n\n- **Yankee** = 11 lines (6 doubles + 4 trebles + 1 four-fold), no singles, min 2 winners — the 4-leg equivalent of a Trixie\n- **Lucky 15** = 15 lines (4 singles + 6 doubles + 4 trebles + 1 four-fold), min 1 winner — the 4-leg equivalent of a Patent\n\nThe upside compounds faster because 4-leg trebles and the four-fold price higher than 3-leg combinations, but the total outlay scales too (Yankee £11, Lucky 15 £15 at £1 per line). If you're drawn to Patents for the singles safety net and you have a 4th pick at similar confidence, the Lucky 15 is usually the logical next step.\n\n### Go Smaller: Straight Treble or Three Singles\n\nIf you're extremely confident in all 3 picks — per-leg hit rate above 60% — a straight treble at the same £4 total as a Trixie actually compounds harder on the 3-winner outcome. The trade-off is that a straight treble returns £0 on any non-perfect slate, where a Trixie returns on 2-winner slates.\n\nIf you're only confident on individual picks but not on combinations, 3 separate singles at £1-£2 each can outperform either system bet. You're giving up the compounding benefit of doubles and the treble, but you're also not paying for combinations you don't believe in.\n\n### Quick Decision Framework\n\n- **Straight treble** — very high confidence on all 3, per-leg odds 2.5+, and you're comfortable with all-or-nothing\n- **Trixie** — confident 2+ win, per-leg odds below 2.5, no bookmaker bonus available\n- **Patent** — want 1-winner safety, per-leg odds above 2.5, bookmaker bonus in play\n- **Lucky 15 or Yankee** — you have 4 picks instead of 3 at similar confidence\n- **3 separate singles** — no confidence in combinations, just individual picks\n\nFor a deeper walk-through on how to price any of these manually, [the step-by-step system bet calculation guide](\u002Fblog\u002Fhow-to-calculate-system-bet) covers the combinatorial math for every popular format. Or drop the numbers into [our free calculator](\u002Fbetting\u002Fsystem-bet-calculator) and skip the algebra — it handles Trixie, Patent, Yankee, Lucky 15, and the rest in the same interface.\n\n## FAQ",[28,31,34,37,40,43,46,49,52,55,58,61],{"answer":29,"question":30},"Not automatically. A Patent costs 75% more than a Trixie (£7 vs £4 at £1 per line) because it adds 3 singles on top of the Trixie's 3 doubles and 1 treble. Those singles let the Patent pay out on just 1 winner — a Trixie needs 2. Whether the extra £3 is worth it depends on per-leg odds: above 2.0 the singles produce positive expected value, below 2.0 they bleed. On short-priced favourites the Trixie wins on pure cost efficiency.","Is a Patent better than a Trixie?",{"answer":32,"question":33},"Both wrap 3 selections, but a Trixie is 4 bets (3 doubles + 1 treble) while a Patent is 7 bets (3 singles + 3 doubles + 1 treble). The Patent adds the singles layer that a Trixie omits. Practical effect: a Trixie needs at least 2 winners to return anything, a Patent returns money on just 1 winner. The stake multiplier also changes — Trixie ×4, Patent ×7.","What's the difference between a Trixie and a Patent bet?",{"answer":35,"question":36},"£4 total. A Trixie contains 4 lines (3 doubles + 1 treble) and each is priced as a separate stake. A £2 Trixie costs £8. Each-way Trixie doubles the line count to 8, so a £1-each-way Trixie costs £8. Every bookmaker confirms the total outlay on the slip before submission — read the 'Total Stake' field, not just the 'Stake' field.","How much does a £1 Trixie bet cost?",{"answer":38,"question":39},"£7 total. A Patent contains 7 lines (3 singles + 3 doubles + 1 treble) priced individually. A £2 Patent costs £14. Each-way Patent doubles the line count to 14, so a £1-each-way Patent costs £14. The stake is 75% higher than an equivalent Trixie because you are paying £3 extra for the 3 singles layer that acts as a 1-winner safety net.","How much does a £1 Patent bet cost?",{"answer":41,"question":42},"Two main ones. First, a Trixie dies completely on 0 or 1 winners — the 3 doubles and the treble all contain at least one loser in either scenario, so you lose the full stake. Second, a Trixie total outlay is 4× your per-line stake, which catches out punters who type '£10' thinking it means £10 total and see £40 deducted. The trade-off for that extra cost is broader coverage than a standalone treble, not a singles safety net.","What are the disadvantages of a Trixie bet?",{"answer":44,"question":45},"A Trixie is worth it when you're confident 2+ of your 3 picks will win and each leg is priced below 2.5. Below 2.5, the singles layer of a Patent doesn't earn its £3 premium, so Trixie is the cheaper path to the same double\u002Ftreble coverage. Above 2.5 per leg, the Patent's singles usually pay for themselves, so a Trixie starts leaving money on the table. Use the break-even math or run it through a system bet tool before deciding.","Is a Trixie bet worth it?",{"answer":47,"question":48},"Yes on both. Each-way doubles the line count: Trixie goes from 4 to 8 lines, Patent from 7 to 14. The place portion typically pays 1\u002F4 or 1\u002F5 of the win odds depending on the race type and runner count. Each-way makes sense on horse racing with 8+ runners priced 4.0 or higher — place terms are generous enough to justify the doubled outlay. On short-priced favourites under 2.5 the each-way portion is usually too small to be worth the extra stake.","Can you place each-way Trixie and Patent bets?",{"answer":50,"question":51},"The voided leg drops out and every line containing it re-prices. On a Trixie: the treble becomes a double at the two surviving odds, and the two doubles with the voided leg become singles on the remaining leg (effectively). On a Patent: the single on the voided leg is refunded, the treble becomes a double, and two of the three doubles become singles. Some books apply the 'reduced-to-1.0' rule instead — check the bookmaker's T&Cs for the exact handling.","What happens if one leg is a non-runner in a Trixie or Patent?",{"answer":53,"question":54},"Bonuses are more common on Patents than Trixies. UK bookmakers like Paddy Power, William Hill and Betfair offer single-winner bonuses (2x-4x the single return) and all-winners bonuses (10%-20% boost on the full payout). These bonuses only apply to the win-only versions — each-way Patents usually exclude them. Trixies occasionally get all-winners bonuses but rarely get singles-based bonuses because Trixies don't have singles to bonus in the first place.","Can you get bonuses on a Trixie or Patent bet?",{"answer":56,"question":57},"Any sport with discrete win markets. Horse racing dominates both in the UK and Ireland because of the varied odds, but football, tennis, greyhounds, golf outrights and darts all accept Trixie and Patent bets. The selections must be independent events — bookmakers reject correlated picks from the same match or race. NFL moneylines, Premier League match winners, and golf top-5 finishes are common US and UK choices in 2026.","What sports can you use Trixie and Patent bets on?",{"answer":59,"question":60},"Beginners usually benefit more from a Patent because the singles give a forgiving floor: even a rough slate with 1 winner returns something, which teaches bet settlement in a low-pain way. A Trixie losing the full £4 on a 1-winner slate is harsh feedback for a new punter. The trade-off is the higher Patent cost (£7 vs £4), so keep stakes small — a 10p-per-line Patent is £0.70 total and plenty for learning the structure.","Should a beginner choose a Trixie or a Patent?",{"answer":62,"question":63},"Structurally yes. A Lucky 15 uses 4 selections with 15 lines (4 singles + 6 doubles + 4 trebles + 1 four-fold) — the same 'full cover with singles' pattern the Patent applies to 3 selections. Patent is to Trixie what Lucky 15 is to Yankee: both add a singles layer to the base structure. If you understand the Trixie vs Patent trade-off, the Lucky 15 vs Yankee decision uses identical math at a larger scale.","Is a Lucky 15 the same as a Patent with 4 selections?",[65,66,67,68],"en","ru","de","tr",{"data":70,"body":71},{},{"type":72,"children":73},"root",[74,82,88,93,115,121,126,133,253,259,294,307,313,318,324,329,371,376,381,387,392,453,458,463,476,482,487,492,498,503,509,514,537,542,548,553,574,579,585,590,613,618,624,629,652,657,663,667,680,686,691,697,702,1066,1071,1085,1091,1111,1116,1139,1145,1158,1163,1181,1187,1197,1210,1223,1229,1234,1240,1293,1299,1359,1365,1401,1406,1412,1417,1423,1428,1435,1453,1459,1471,1477,1482,1487,1493,1498,1503,1509,1514,1520,1525,1530,1536,1541,1554,1560,1565,1570,1576,1581,1586,1592,1604,1608,1614,1619,1625,1630,1653,1658,1664,1669,1674,1680,1731,1750],{"type":75,"tag":76,"props":77,"children":79},"element","h2",{"id":78},"trixie-bet-vs-patent-the-4-vs-7-bet-breakdown-2026",[80],{"type":81,"value":15},"text",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":84,"children":85},"p",{},[86],{"type":81,"value":87},"Picture this: you're standing at the betting counter, slip in hand, three horses picked out for the Saturday card. Your mate leans over and says \"do a Trixie — four bets, cheaper.\" The guy behind you in the queue disagrees: \"nah, go Patent, you get something back on just one winner.\" One of them is right for your slate, one of them is wrong, and the answer depends on numbers almost no pub debate ever actually runs.",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":89,"children":90},{},[91],{"type":81,"value":92},"That single difference — 4 bets versus 7 bets on the same 3 selections — is the whole Trixie vs Patent argument in 2026. A Trixie at £1 per line costs £4 total. A Patent at £1 per line costs £7 total. The extra £3 buys you exactly one thing: three singles on your picks, which means a Patent pays out on just 1 winner where a Trixie needs 2. Whether that £3 premium is worth paying comes down to per-leg odds, confidence, and whether the bookmaker is dangling a single-winner bonus.",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":94,"children":95},{},[96,98,105,107,113],{"type":81,"value":97},"If you just want a calculator, skip straight to our ",{"type":75,"tag":99,"props":100,"children":102},"a",{"href":101},"\u002Fbetting\u002Fsystem-bet-calculator",[103],{"type":81,"value":104},"universal system bet calculator",{"type":81,"value":106}," — it handles Trixie, Patent, each-way, Rule 4, bonuses, everything. This guide exists for understanding ",{"type":75,"tag":108,"props":109,"children":110},"em",{},[111],{"type":81,"value":112},"when",{"type":81,"value":114}," that calculator's answer says \"take the Patent\" and when it says \"save the £3.\"",{"type":75,"tag":76,"props":116,"children":118},{"id":117},"tldr-quick-summary",[119],{"type":81,"value":120},"TL;DR — Quick Summary",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":122,"children":123},{},[124],{"type":81,"value":125},"A Trixie is 4 bets (3 doubles + 1 treble) on 3 selections. A Patent is 7 bets (3 singles + 3 doubles + 1 treble) on the same 3 selections. The Patent adds the 3 singles a Trixie deliberately leaves out. That singles layer costs £3 extra per £1 per line and lets the Patent pay out on just 1 winner, where a Trixie needs at least 2.",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":128,"children":130},"h3",{"id":129},"the-4-vs-7-breakdown-at-a-glance",[131],{"type":81,"value":132},"The 4-vs-7 Breakdown at a Glance",{"type":75,"tag":134,"props":135,"children":136},"table",{},[137,166],{"type":75,"tag":138,"props":139,"children":140},"thead",{},[141],{"type":75,"tag":68,"props":142,"children":143},{},[144,150,156,161],{"type":75,"tag":145,"props":146,"children":147},"th",{},[148],{"type":81,"value":149},"Bet type",{"type":75,"tag":145,"props":151,"children":153},{"align":152},"center",[154],{"type":81,"value":155},"Lines",{"type":75,"tag":145,"props":157,"children":158},{"align":152},[159],{"type":81,"value":160},"£1 per line cost",{"type":75,"tag":145,"props":162,"children":163},{"align":152},[164],{"type":81,"value":165},"Min winners for any return",{"type":75,"tag":167,"props":168,"children":169},"tbody",{},[170,194,217],{"type":75,"tag":68,"props":171,"children":172},{},[173,179,184,189],{"type":75,"tag":174,"props":175,"children":176},"td",{},[177],{"type":81,"value":178},"Trixie",{"type":75,"tag":174,"props":180,"children":181},{"align":152},[182],{"type":81,"value":183},"4",{"type":75,"tag":174,"props":185,"children":186},{"align":152},[187],{"type":81,"value":188},"£4",{"type":75,"tag":174,"props":190,"children":191},{"align":152},[192],{"type":81,"value":193},"2",{"type":75,"tag":68,"props":195,"children":196},{},[197,202,207,212],{"type":75,"tag":174,"props":198,"children":199},{},[200],{"type":81,"value":201},"Patent",{"type":75,"tag":174,"props":203,"children":204},{"align":152},[205],{"type":81,"value":206},"7",{"type":75,"tag":174,"props":208,"children":209},{"align":152},[210],{"type":81,"value":211},"£7",{"type":75,"tag":174,"props":213,"children":214},{"align":152},[215],{"type":81,"value":216},"1",{"type":75,"tag":68,"props":218,"children":219},{},[220,229,237,245],{"type":75,"tag":174,"props":221,"children":222},{},[223],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":225,"children":226},"strong",{},[227],{"type":81,"value":228},"Difference",{"type":75,"tag":174,"props":230,"children":231},{"align":152},[232],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":233,"children":234},{},[235],{"type":81,"value":236},"+3 singles",{"type":75,"tag":174,"props":238,"children":239},{"align":152},[240],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":241,"children":242},{},[243],{"type":81,"value":244},"+£3 (+75%)",{"type":75,"tag":174,"props":246,"children":247},{"align":152},[248],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":249,"children":250},{},[251],{"type":81,"value":252},"−1 winner",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":254,"children":256},{"id":255},"when-each-one-wins",[257],{"type":81,"value":258},"When Each One Wins",{"type":75,"tag":260,"props":261,"children":262},"ul",{},[263,274,284],{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":265,"children":266},"li",{},[267,272],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":268,"children":269},{},[270],{"type":81,"value":271},"Pick a Trixie",{"type":81,"value":273}," when per-leg odds are below 2.5 and you're confident 2+ picks will win. The singles layer of a Patent doesn't earn its £3 premium at short prices.",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":275,"children":276},{},[277,282],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":278,"children":279},{},[280],{"type":81,"value":281},"Pick a Patent",{"type":81,"value":283}," when per-leg odds are above 2.5 and you want the 1-winner safety net. At longer odds the 3 singles produce positive expected value on their own.",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":285,"children":286},{},[287,292],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":288,"children":289},{},[290],{"type":81,"value":291},"Pick neither",{"type":81,"value":293}," when you're highly confident in all 3 picks — a straight treble at £4 stake compounds harder than either system bet.",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":295,"children":296},{},[297,299,305],{"type":81,"value":298},"If the system bet concept itself is fresh, ",{"type":75,"tag":99,"props":300,"children":302},{"href":301},"\u002Fblog\u002Fwhat-is-a-system-bet-explained",[303],{"type":81,"value":304},"this explainer on what a system bet is",{"type":81,"value":306}," walks through the basics in under five minutes.",{"type":75,"tag":76,"props":308,"children":310},{"id":309},"how-a-trixie-and-a-patent-are-built",[311],{"type":81,"value":312},"How a Trixie and a Patent Are Built",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":314,"children":315},{},[316],{"type":81,"value":317},"Both bets look identical on a betting slip: three selections, one bet type selected, one stake entered. The difference is entirely in what lines the bookmaker generates under the hood. Understanding the 4-vs-7 anatomy explains why the Patent costs 75% more and why that extra cost does specific work.",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":319,"children":321},{"id":320},"the-trixie-4-lines-no-singles",[322],{"type":81,"value":323},"The Trixie: 4 Lines, No Singles",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":325,"children":326},{},[327],{"type":81,"value":328},"A Trixie takes your 3 picks — call them A, B, and C — and builds:",{"type":75,"tag":330,"props":331,"children":332},"ol",{},[333,343,352,361],{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":334,"children":335},{},[336,341],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":337,"children":338},{},[339],{"type":81,"value":340},"Double A+B",{"type":81,"value":342}," — both legs must win",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":344,"children":345},{},[346,351],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":347,"children":348},{},[349],{"type":81,"value":350},"Double A+C",{"type":81,"value":342},{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":353,"children":354},{},[355,360],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":356,"children":357},{},[358],{"type":81,"value":359},"Double B+C",{"type":81,"value":342},{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":362,"children":363},{},[364,369],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":365,"children":366},{},[367],{"type":81,"value":368},"Treble A+B+C",{"type":81,"value":370}," — all three must win",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":372,"children":373},{},[374],{"type":81,"value":375},"Count: 3 doubles + 1 treble = 4 lines. That's every way to pair your selections plus the one way to combine all three. No singles. If just 1 pick wins, every line contains at least one loser and the full £4 stake dies.",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":377,"children":378},{},[379],{"type":81,"value":380},"The Trixie is what bookmakers call a \"full-cover bet without singles.\" The \"full cover\" means every possible multi-combination from 2 up to all selections; the \"without singles\" is the £3 saving over the Patent.",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":382,"children":384},{"id":383},"the-patent-7-lines-with-the-singles-layer",[385],{"type":81,"value":386},"The Patent: 7 Lines With the Singles Layer",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":388,"children":389},{},[390],{"type":81,"value":391},"A Patent takes the same 3 picks and builds:",{"type":75,"tag":330,"props":393,"children":394},{},[395,405,415,425,432,439,446],{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":396,"children":397},{},[398,403],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":399,"children":400},{},[401],{"type":81,"value":402},"Single A",{"type":81,"value":404}," — leg A wins",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":406,"children":407},{},[408,413],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":409,"children":410},{},[411],{"type":81,"value":412},"Single B",{"type":81,"value":414}," — leg B wins",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":416,"children":417},{},[418,423],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":419,"children":420},{},[421],{"type":81,"value":422},"Single C",{"type":81,"value":424}," — leg C wins",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":426,"children":427},{},[428],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":429,"children":430},{},[431],{"type":81,"value":340},{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":433,"children":434},{},[435],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":436,"children":437},{},[438],{"type":81,"value":350},{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":440,"children":441},{},[442],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":443,"children":444},{},[445],{"type":81,"value":359},{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":447,"children":448},{},[449],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":450,"children":451},{},[452],{"type":81,"value":368},{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":454,"children":455},{},[456],{"type":81,"value":457},"Count: 3 singles + 3 doubles + 1 treble = 7 lines. Every line from the Trixie is still there, plus the 3 singles on top. That's why the Patent is called a \"full-cover bet with singles.\"",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":459,"children":460},{},[461],{"type":81,"value":462},"The 3 singles are exactly what they sound like: one independent bet per selection, priced at that selection's odds alone. Win one, collect that single's return. Every extra winner unlocks more lines on top (doubles with the other winners, the treble if all three hit), but the singles always pay independently.",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":464,"children":465},{},[466,468,474],{"type":81,"value":467},"For the full combinatorial math behind these line counts, ",{"type":75,"tag":99,"props":469,"children":471},{"href":470},"\u002Fblog\u002Fhow-to-calculate-system-bet",[472],{"type":81,"value":473},"the system bet calculation walkthrough",{"type":81,"value":475}," covers C(n,k) derivations for every popular format.",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":477,"children":479},{"id":478},"why-the-extra-3-buys-a-different-floor",[480],{"type":81,"value":481},"Why the Extra £3 Buys a Different Floor",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":483,"children":484},{},[485],{"type":81,"value":486},"On a £1-per-line stake the difference in total outlay is tiny in absolute terms — £4 versus £7 — but the structural difference is enormous. A Trixie has a floor of £0: zero winners or exactly 1 winner both return nothing. A Patent has a floor determined by your lowest-odds pick: even a single-winner slate returns at least the winning single's payout.",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":488,"children":489},{},[490],{"type":81,"value":491},"That's the fundamental Trixie vs Patent trade-off. You're not buying more \"potential upside\" with a Patent — both formats have identical maximum payouts when all 3 legs land, because the doubles and the treble are the same in both. You're buying a non-zero floor on bad slates.",{"type":75,"tag":76,"props":493,"children":495},{"id":494},"payout-scenarios-winner-by-winner-3-selections-at-30",[496],{"type":81,"value":497},"Payout Scenarios: Winner by Winner (3 Selections at 3.0)",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":499,"children":500},{},[501],{"type":81,"value":502},"This is the section most competitor guides skip. Below are the exact payouts across all 4 possible outcomes on a 3-pick Trixie and Patent, each at per-leg odds of 3.0 with £1 per line stake. Trixie total stake £4, Patent total stake £7, before any bookmaker bonuses.",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":504,"children":506},{"id":505},"_0-winners-both-dead",[507],{"type":81,"value":508},"0 Winners — Both Dead",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":510,"children":511},{},[512],{"type":81,"value":513},"No lines survive in either format. Every double, treble, and single (on the Patent) contains at least one loser.",{"type":75,"tag":260,"props":515,"children":516},{},[517,527],{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":518,"children":519},{},[520,522],{"type":81,"value":521},"Trixie: ",{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":523,"children":524},{},[525],{"type":81,"value":526},"£0 return on £4 stake = −£4 net",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":528,"children":529},{},[530,532],{"type":81,"value":531},"Patent: ",{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":533,"children":534},{},[535],{"type":81,"value":536},"£0 return on £7 stake = −£7 net",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":538,"children":539},{},[540],{"type":81,"value":541},"Obvious outcome: both full stakes lost. The Patent's £3 premium buys nothing here — no singles hit if no selections win.",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":543,"children":545},{"id":544},"_1-winner-where-patent-earns-its-keep",[546],{"type":81,"value":547},"1 Winner — Where Patent Earns Its Keep",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":549,"children":550},{},[551],{"type":81,"value":552},"Exactly 1 of 3 selections wins. On a Trixie, every line contains at least one of the two losing legs and dies. On a Patent, the 2 singles on the losing legs die, but the 1 single on the winning leg survives.",{"type":75,"tag":260,"props":554,"children":555},{},[556,564],{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":557,"children":558},{},[559,560],{"type":81,"value":521},{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":561,"children":562},{},[563],{"type":81,"value":526},{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":565,"children":566},{},[567,569],{"type":81,"value":568},"Patent: 1 single × 3.0 × £1 = ",{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":570,"children":571},{},[572],{"type":81,"value":573},"£3 return on £7 stake = −£4 net",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":575,"children":576},{},[577],{"type":81,"value":578},"Here's the interesting part: both formats show a £4 net loss at per-leg odds of 3.0 on a 1-winner slate. The Patent returns £3 from the surviving single, but you paid £3 extra in stake to make that single exist, so the two cancel out. The real benefit of the Patent on 1-winner slates only kicks in when the per-leg odds are above 3.0 — the single's return exceeds the £3 extra stake, flipping the scenario from \"break-even vs Trixie\" to \"net better than Trixie.\"",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":580,"children":582},{"id":581},"_2-winners-trixie-starts-paying",[583],{"type":81,"value":584},"2 Winners — Trixie Starts Paying",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":586,"children":587},{},[588],{"type":81,"value":589},"Exactly 2 of 3 selections win. On both formats, the 1 double combining those two winners survives. On the Patent, 2 singles also survive. The treble dies in both cases.",{"type":75,"tag":260,"props":591,"children":592},{},[593,603],{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":594,"children":595},{},[596,598],{"type":81,"value":597},"Trixie: 1 double × 9.0 × £1 = ",{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":599,"children":600},{},[601],{"type":81,"value":602},"£9 return on £4 stake = +£5 net",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":604,"children":605},{},[606,608],{"type":81,"value":607},"Patent: 2 singles × 3.0 × £1 = £6, plus 1 double × 9.0 × £1 = £9, total = ",{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":609,"children":610},{},[611],{"type":81,"value":612},"£15 return on £7 stake = +£8 net",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":614,"children":615},{},[616],{"type":81,"value":617},"Both formats turn profitable at the 2-winner mark. The Patent shows a bigger absolute profit because of the 2 surviving singles, but the percentage return on stake is higher on the Trixie (£9 on £4 = 125%) than on the Patent (£15 on £7 = 114%). Efficiency vs absolute profit — the classic Trixie vs Patent trade-off in one line.",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":619,"children":621},{"id":620},"_3-winners-both-full-payout",[622],{"type":81,"value":623},"3 Winners — Both Full Payout",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":625,"children":626},{},[627],{"type":81,"value":628},"All 3 selections win. Every line in both formats survives. Maximum payout scenario.",{"type":75,"tag":260,"props":630,"children":631},{},[632,642],{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":633,"children":634},{},[635,637],{"type":81,"value":636},"Trixie: 3 doubles × 9.0 × £1 + 1 treble × 27.0 × £1 = £27 + £27 = ",{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":638,"children":639},{},[640],{"type":81,"value":641},"£54 return on £4 stake = +£50 net",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":643,"children":644},{},[645,647],{"type":81,"value":646},"Patent: 3 singles × 3.0 × £1 + 3 doubles × 9.0 × £1 + 1 treble × 27.0 × £1 = £9 + £27 + £27 = ",{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":648,"children":649},{},[650],{"type":81,"value":651},"£63 return on £7 stake = +£56 net",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":653,"children":654},{},[655],{"type":81,"value":656},"With a typical 10% all-winners bonus applied, the Patent climbs to £69.30 (+£62.30 net) and the Trixie to £59.40 (+£55.40 net). The Patent has the bigger absolute number again, but the Trixie's return on stake (£54 on £4 = 1250%) crushes the Patent's (£63 on £7 = 900%). If you had £7 to spend and you knew all 3 picks would win, putting £1.75 per line on the Trixie (£7 total) would return £94.50 — more than the Patent's £63.",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":658,"children":660},{"id":659},"visualising-the-payout-curve",[661],{"type":81,"value":662},"Visualising the Payout Curve",{"type":75,"tag":664,"props":665,"children":666},"chart-trixie-vs-patent-returns",{},[],{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":668,"children":669},{},[670,672,678],{"type":81,"value":671},"The chart makes the 1-winner gap obvious: Patent has a non-zero floor from the surviving single, Trixie sits at £0. Every extra winner drives both payouts up steeply, but the gap between them narrows in percentage terms as winners accumulate. For a side-by-side comparison against straight accumulators on the same slates, ",{"type":75,"tag":99,"props":673,"children":675},{"href":674},"\u002Fblog\u002Fsystem-bet-vs-accumulator",[676],{"type":81,"value":677},"the system bet vs accumulator breakdown",{"type":81,"value":679}," runs identical picks through both structures.",{"type":75,"tag":76,"props":681,"children":683},{"id":682},"trixie-vs-patent-break-even-hit-rate-math",[684],{"type":81,"value":685},"Trixie vs Patent: Break-Even Hit Rate Math",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":687,"children":688},{},[689],{"type":81,"value":690},"Most Trixie vs Patent choices get made on feel. \"I feel good about all three, I'll take a Trixie\" or \"one of them's a bit iffy, let me hedge with a Patent.\" Feelings lose money. The actual expected value calculation is one line of algebra and it tells you exactly when the extra £3 of Patent singles pays for itself.",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":692,"children":694},{"id":693},"the-singles-layer-ev-formula",[695],{"type":81,"value":696},"The Singles Layer EV Formula",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":698,"children":699},{},[700],{"type":81,"value":701},"The Patent's 3 singles each have expected value = probability × odds − 1 per £1 stake. Aggregated across the 3 singles layer at £1 per line:",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":703,"children":704},{},[705],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":707,"children":710},"span",{"className":708},[709],"katex",[711,827],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":712,"children":715},{"className":713},[714],"katex-mathml",[716],{"type":75,"tag":717,"props":718,"children":720},"math",{"xmlns":719},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.w3.org\u002F1998\u002FMath\u002FMathML",[721],{"type":75,"tag":722,"props":723,"children":724},"semantics",{},[725,820],{"type":75,"tag":726,"props":727,"children":728},"mrow",{},[729,735,781,787,793,798,802,806,811,816],{"type":75,"tag":730,"props":731,"children":732},"mi",{},[733],{"type":81,"value":734},"E",{"type":75,"tag":736,"props":737,"children":738},"msub",{},[739,744],{"type":75,"tag":730,"props":740,"children":741},{},[742],{"type":81,"value":743},"V",{"type":75,"tag":726,"props":745,"children":746},{},[747,752,757,762,767,772,777],{"type":75,"tag":730,"props":748,"children":749},{},[750],{"type":81,"value":751},"s",{"type":75,"tag":730,"props":753,"children":754},{},[755],{"type":81,"value":756},"i",{"type":75,"tag":730,"props":758,"children":759},{},[760],{"type":81,"value":761},"n",{"type":75,"tag":730,"props":763,"children":764},{},[765],{"type":81,"value":766},"g",{"type":75,"tag":730,"props":768,"children":769},{},[770],{"type":81,"value":771},"l",{"type":75,"tag":730,"props":773,"children":774},{},[775],{"type":81,"value":776},"e",{"type":75,"tag":730,"props":778,"children":779},{},[780],{"type":81,"value":751},{"type":75,"tag":782,"props":783,"children":784},"mo",{},[785],{"type":81,"value":786},"=",{"type":75,"tag":788,"props":789,"children":790},"mn",{},[791],{"type":81,"value":792},"3",{"type":75,"tag":782,"props":794,"children":795},{},[796],{"type":81,"value":797},"×",{"type":75,"tag":730,"props":799,"children":800},{},[801],{"type":81,"value":83},{"type":75,"tag":782,"props":803,"children":804},{},[805],{"type":81,"value":797},{"type":75,"tag":730,"props":807,"children":808},{},[809],{"type":81,"value":810},"o",{"type":75,"tag":782,"props":812,"children":813},{},[814],{"type":81,"value":815},"−",{"type":75,"tag":788,"props":817,"children":818},{},[819],{"type":81,"value":792},{"type":75,"tag":821,"props":822,"children":824},"annotation",{"encoding":823},"application\u002Fx-tex",[825],{"type":81,"value":826},"EV_{singles} = 3 \\times p \\times o - 3",{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":828,"children":832},{"className":829,"ariaHidden":831},[830],"katex-html","true",[833,970,998,1025,1052],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":834,"children":837},{"className":835},[836],"base",[838,844,852,954,960,966],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":839,"children":843},{"className":840,"style":842},[841],"strut","height:0.9694em;vertical-align:-0.2861em;",[],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":845,"children":850},{"className":846,"style":849},[847,848],"mord","mathnormal","margin-right:0.0576em;",[851],{"type":81,"value":734},{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":853,"children":855},{"className":854},[847],[856,862],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":857,"children":860},{"className":858,"style":859},[847,848],"margin-right:0.2222em;",[861],{"type":81,"value":743},{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":863,"children":866},{"className":864},[865],"msupsub",[867],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":868,"children":872},{"className":869},[870,871],"vlist-t","vlist-t2",[873,942],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":874,"children":877},{"className":875},[876],"vlist-r",[878,935],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":879,"children":883},{"className":880,"style":882},[881],"vlist","height:0.3361em;",[884],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":885,"children":887},{"style":886},"top:-2.55em;margin-left:-0.2222em;margin-right:0.05em;",[888,894],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":889,"children":893},{"className":890,"style":892},[891],"pstrut","height:2.7em;",[],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":895,"children":901},{"className":896},[897,898,899,900],"sizing","reset-size6","size3","mtight",[902],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":903,"children":905},{"className":904},[847,900],[906,911,917,923,929],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":907,"children":909},{"className":908},[847,848,900],[910],{"type":81,"value":751},{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":912,"children":914},{"className":913},[847,848,900],[915],{"type":81,"value":916},"in",{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":918,"children":921},{"className":919,"style":920},[847,848,900],"margin-right:0.0359em;",[922],{"type":81,"value":766},{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":924,"children":927},{"className":925,"style":926},[847,848,900],"margin-right:0.0197em;",[928],{"type":81,"value":771},{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":930,"children":932},{"className":931},[847,848,900],[933],{"type":81,"value":934},"es",{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":936,"children":939},{"className":937},[938],"vlist-s",[940],{"type":81,"value":941},"​",{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":943,"children":945},{"className":944},[876],[946],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":947,"children":950},{"className":948,"style":949},[881],"height:0.2861em;",[951],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":952,"children":953},{},[],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":955,"children":959},{"className":956,"style":958},[957],"mspace","margin-right:0.2778em;",[],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":961,"children":964},{"className":962},[963],"mrel",[965],{"type":81,"value":786},{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":967,"children":969},{"className":968,"style":958},[957],[],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":971,"children":973},{"className":972},[836],[974,979,984,988,994],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":975,"children":978},{"className":976,"style":977},[841],"height:0.7278em;vertical-align:-0.0833em;",[],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":980,"children":982},{"className":981},[847],[983],{"type":81,"value":792},{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":985,"children":987},{"className":986,"style":859},[957],[],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":989,"children":992},{"className":990},[991],"mbin",[993],{"type":81,"value":797},{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":995,"children":997},{"className":996,"style":859},[957],[],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":999,"children":1001},{"className":1000},[836],[1002,1007,1012,1016,1021],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":1003,"children":1006},{"className":1004,"style":1005},[841],"height:0.7778em;vertical-align:-0.1944em;",[],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":1008,"children":1010},{"className":1009},[847,848],[1011],{"type":81,"value":83},{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":1013,"children":1015},{"className":1014,"style":859},[957],[],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":1017,"children":1019},{"className":1018},[991],[1020],{"type":81,"value":797},{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":1022,"children":1024},{"className":1023,"style":859},[957],[],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":1026,"children":1028},{"className":1027},[836],[1029,1034,1039,1043,1048],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":1030,"children":1033},{"className":1031,"style":1032},[841],"height:0.6667em;vertical-align:-0.0833em;",[],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":1035,"children":1037},{"className":1036},[847,848],[1038],{"type":81,"value":810},{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":1040,"children":1042},{"className":1041,"style":859},[957],[],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":1044,"children":1046},{"className":1045},[991],[1047],{"type":81,"value":815},{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":1049,"children":1051},{"className":1050,"style":859},[957],[],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":1053,"children":1055},{"className":1054},[836],[1056,1061],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":1057,"children":1060},{"className":1058,"style":1059},[841],"height:0.6444em;",[],{"type":75,"tag":706,"props":1062,"children":1064},{"className":1063},[847],[1065],{"type":81,"value":792},{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1067,"children":1068},{},[1069],{"type":81,"value":1070},"Plain English: multiply your per-leg hit rate by the odds, multiply by 3 singles, subtract the £3 total extra stake. If the result is positive, the singles layer has positive expected value and Patent beats Trixie over the long run. If negative, Trixie wins on cost efficiency.",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1072,"children":1073},{},[1074,1076,1083],{"type":81,"value":1075},"The decisive condition simplifies to: ",{"type":75,"tag":1077,"props":1078,"children":1080},"code",{"className":1079},[],[1081],{"type":81,"value":1082},"p × o > 1",{"type":81,"value":1084},". Per-leg probability times per-leg odds must exceed 1 for the Patent singles to pay for themselves.",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":1086,"children":1088},{"id":1087},"when-patent-wins-singles-ev-positive",[1089],{"type":81,"value":1090},"When Patent Wins: Singles EV Positive",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1092,"children":1093},{},[1094,1096,1101,1103,1109],{"type":81,"value":1095},"At fair odds with no bookmaker margin, the singles layer has positive EV whenever per-leg ",{"type":75,"tag":1077,"props":1097,"children":1099},{"className":1098},[],[1100],{"type":81,"value":1082},{"type":81,"value":1102},". Typical 2026 bookmaker overround is 105-110% on single markets, so you want ",{"type":75,"tag":1077,"props":1104,"children":1106},{"className":1105},[],[1107],{"type":81,"value":1108},"p × o > 1.05",{"type":81,"value":1110}," or better to beat the vig.",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1112,"children":1113},{},[1114],{"type":81,"value":1115},"Concrete 2026 examples where Patent wins:",{"type":75,"tag":260,"props":1117,"children":1118},{},[1119,1124,1129,1134],{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1120,"children":1121},{},[1122],{"type":81,"value":1123},"3 picks at 3.0 odds and 40% hit rate: 0.40 × 3.0 = 1.20 → Patent wins (+20% EV on singles)",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1125,"children":1126},{},[1127],{"type":81,"value":1128},"3 picks at 4.0 odds and 30% hit rate: 0.30 × 4.0 = 1.20 → Patent wins (+20% EV)",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1130,"children":1131},{},[1132],{"type":81,"value":1133},"3 picks at 5.0 odds and 25% hit rate: 0.25 × 5.0 = 1.25 → Patent wins (+25% EV)",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1135,"children":1136},{},[1137],{"type":81,"value":1138},"Any slip where the bookmaker offers a 3x single-winner bonus — flips EV sharply in Patent's favour even at shorter prices",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":1140,"children":1142},{"id":1141},"when-trixie-wins-singles-ev-negative",[1143],{"type":81,"value":1144},"When Trixie Wins: Singles EV Negative",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1146,"children":1147},{},[1148,1150,1156],{"type":81,"value":1149},"Trixie beats Patent on net EV when the singles layer has negative expected value: ",{"type":75,"tag":1077,"props":1151,"children":1153},{"className":1152},[],[1154],{"type":81,"value":1155},"p × o \u003C 1",{"type":81,"value":1157},". This happens on short-priced favourites where the bookmaker margin eats into the singles before the odds can compensate.",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1159,"children":1160},{},[1161],{"type":81,"value":1162},"Concrete 2026 examples where Trixie wins:",{"type":75,"tag":260,"props":1164,"children":1165},{},[1166,1171,1176],{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1167,"children":1168},{},[1169],{"type":81,"value":1170},"3 picks at 1.8 odds and 50% hit rate: 0.50 × 1.8 = 0.90 → Trixie wins (singles bleed)",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1172,"children":1173},{},[1174],{"type":81,"value":1175},"3 picks at 2.0 odds and 45% hit rate: 0.45 × 2.0 = 0.90 → Trixie wins",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1177,"children":1178},{},[1179],{"type":81,"value":1180},"Any \"safe\" 3-pick slate where every leg is priced below 2.2 — the £3 singles premium costs more than the singles return",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":1182,"children":1184},{"id":1183},"the-20-odds-pivot-point",[1185],{"type":81,"value":1186},"The 2.0-Odds Pivot Point",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1188,"children":1189},{},[1190,1192],{"type":81,"value":1191},"There's a rough rule of thumb that falls out of the math: ",{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":1193,"children":1194},{},[1195],{"type":81,"value":1196},"below 2.0 per-leg odds, pick Trixie. Above 2.5 per-leg odds, pick Patent. Between 2.0 and 2.5, run the numbers.",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1198,"children":1199},{},[1200,1202,1208],{"type":81,"value":1201},"That pivot works because at exactly 2.0 odds with 50% hit rate, ",{"type":75,"tag":1077,"props":1203,"children":1205},{"className":1204},[],[1206],{"type":81,"value":1207},"p × o = 1.00",{"type":81,"value":1209}," — the singles layer is pure break-even. Below 2.0 you need an unrealistically high hit rate to break the singles even; above 2.5 even moderate hit rates push the singles into profit. The 2.0-2.5 zone is the messy middle where bookmaker bonuses and specific selection confidence tip the scale.",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1211,"children":1212},{},[1213,1215,1221],{"type":81,"value":1214},"This is the same structural trade-off as ",{"type":75,"tag":99,"props":1216,"children":1218},{"href":1217},"\u002Fblog\u002Flucky-15-bet-explained",[1219],{"type":81,"value":1220},"Lucky 15 versus Yankee",{"type":81,"value":1222}," at 4 selections — in both cases, the version with singles wins at longer odds, the version without singles wins at shorter odds. The math is identical, just scaled.",{"type":75,"tag":76,"props":1224,"children":1226},{"id":1225},"when-to-pick-trixie-over-patent-and-vice-versa",[1227],{"type":81,"value":1228},"When to Pick Trixie Over Patent (and Vice Versa)",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1230,"children":1231},{},[1232],{"type":81,"value":1233},"The break-even formula is the mechanical answer. The practical decision also weighs bookmaker bonuses, confidence per leg, budget, and whether you're trying to build a bankroll or play for a single big day. Here's the full decision framework.",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":1235,"children":1237},{"id":1236},"pick-a-trixie-when",[1238],{"type":81,"value":1239},"Pick a Trixie When",{"type":75,"tag":260,"props":1241,"children":1242},{},[1243,1253,1263,1273,1283],{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1244,"children":1245},{},[1246,1251],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":1247,"children":1248},{},[1249],{"type":81,"value":1250},"Per-leg odds below 2.5",{"type":81,"value":1252}," — the singles layer of a Patent bleeds at these prices, Trixie is the cheaper structure for the same double\u002Ftreble coverage",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1254,"children":1255},{},[1256,1261],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":1257,"children":1258},{},[1259],{"type":81,"value":1260},"You're confident 2+ of 3 picks will win",{"type":81,"value":1262}," — Trixie's 2-winner break-even is lower at £4 stake than Patent's at £7 stake",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1264,"children":1265},{},[1266,1271],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":1267,"children":1268},{},[1269],{"type":81,"value":1270},"Your bookmaker doesn't offer Patent bonuses",{"type":81,"value":1272}," — without a 2x-4x single-winner bonus, the Patent loses most of its structural edge",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1274,"children":1275},{},[1276,1281],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":1277,"children":1278},{},[1279],{"type":81,"value":1280},"You want the highest return on stake percentage",{"type":81,"value":1282}," — Trixie's £4 total makes every pound work harder on any winning scenario",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1284,"children":1285},{},[1286,1291],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":1287,"children":1288},{},[1289],{"type":81,"value":1290},"You're comfortable with an all-or-nothing 1-winner outcome",{"type":81,"value":1292}," — Trixie dies on 0 or 1 winners, Patent collects on 1",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":1294,"children":1296},{"id":1295},"pick-a-patent-when",[1297],{"type":81,"value":1298},"Pick a Patent When",{"type":75,"tag":260,"props":1300,"children":1301},{},[1302,1312,1329,1339,1349],{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1303,"children":1304},{},[1305,1310],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":1306,"children":1307},{},[1308],{"type":81,"value":1309},"Per-leg odds above 2.5",{"type":81,"value":1311}," — the 3 singles produce positive expected value on their own, earning the £3 premium",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1313,"children":1314},{},[1315,1320,1322,1327],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":1316,"children":1317},{},[1318],{"type":81,"value":1319},"You want a 1-winner safety net",{"type":81,"value":1321}," — psychologically and practically, seeing ",{"type":75,"tag":108,"props":1323,"children":1324},{},[1325],{"type":81,"value":1326},"something",{"type":81,"value":1328}," come back on a bad day keeps bankrolls alive",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1330,"children":1331},{},[1332,1337],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":1333,"children":1334},{},[1335],{"type":81,"value":1336},"Your bookmaker offers single-winner bonuses",{"type":81,"value":1338}," — Paddy Power's 3x, Betfair's 4x on specific meetings can turn a small return into a real rescue",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1340,"children":1341},{},[1342,1347],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":1343,"children":1344},{},[1345],{"type":81,"value":1346},"You're budgeting for 0-2 winners as the most likely outcome",{"type":81,"value":1348}," — on shaky slates, the Patent's singles layer is exactly what you're paying for",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1350,"children":1351},{},[1352,1357],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":1353,"children":1354},{},[1355],{"type":81,"value":1356},"You're teaching yourself Patent settlement",{"type":81,"value":1358}," — a £0.70 10p-per-line Patent gives all the learning with minimal cost",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":1360,"children":1362},{"id":1361},"the-bookmaker-bonus-shortcut",[1363],{"type":81,"value":1364},"The Bookmaker Bonus Shortcut",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1366,"children":1367},{},[1368,1370,1376,1378,1384,1386,1391,1393,1399],{"type":81,"value":1369},"There's a shortcut buried in every Trixie vs Patent decision: the single-winner bonus. If your bookmaker offers a 3x bonus on a 1-winner Patent, your singles EV formula becomes ",{"type":75,"tag":1077,"props":1371,"children":1373},{"className":1372},[],[1374],{"type":81,"value":1375},"3 × p × 3o − 3",{"type":81,"value":1377},", which simplifies to ",{"type":75,"tag":1077,"props":1379,"children":1381},{"className":1380},[],[1382],{"type":81,"value":1383},"3 × p × o − 1",{"type":81,"value":1385},". The break-even hit rate for the Patent's singles layer drops from ",{"type":75,"tag":1077,"props":1387,"children":1389},{"className":1388},[],[1390],{"type":81,"value":1082},{"type":81,"value":1392}," to roughly ",{"type":75,"tag":1077,"props":1394,"children":1396},{"className":1395},[],[1397],{"type":81,"value":1398},"p × o > 0.33",{"type":81,"value":1400}," — you can take the Patent on much shorter-priced slates and still print.",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1402,"children":1403},{},[1404],{"type":81,"value":1405},"Those bonuses don't apply to every bookmaker, every slip, or every race type. Minimum odds restrictions, minimum runner counts, and each-way exclusions all apply. Always check the specific T&Cs before committing to a Patent on the bonus — a \"headline 4x bonus\" that actually requires 2.0+ odds per leg and 6+ runners can silently fail to trigger.",{"type":75,"tag":76,"props":1407,"children":1409},{"id":1408},"each-way-rule-4-and-non-runner-rules",[1410],{"type":81,"value":1411},"Each-Way, Rule 4, and Non-Runner Rules",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1413,"children":1414},{},[1415],{"type":81,"value":1416},"The structural Trixie vs Patent decision is one layer. A second layer — each-way, Rule 4 deductions, and non-runner re-pricing — can shift the math for horse racing slates in 2026.",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":1418,"children":1420},{"id":1419},"each-way-trixie-vs-patent",[1421],{"type":81,"value":1422},"Each-Way Trixie vs Patent",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1424,"children":1425},{},[1426],{"type":81,"value":1427},"Each-way doubles the line count: Trixie goes from 4 to 8 lines, Patent from 7 to 14. The place portion pays at 1\u002F4 or 1\u002F5 of the win odds depending on the runner count and race type. A £1-each-way Trixie is £8 total outlay; a £1-each-way Patent is £14.",{"type":75,"tag":1429,"props":1430,"children":1432},"h4",{"id":1431},"when-each-way-makes-sense",[1433],{"type":81,"value":1434},"When Each-Way Makes Sense",{"type":75,"tag":260,"props":1436,"children":1437},{},[1438,1443,1448],{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1439,"children":1440},{},[1441],{"type":81,"value":1442},"All 3 selections are priced 4.0 or higher (generous place terms apply)",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1444,"children":1445},{},[1446],{"type":81,"value":1447},"Horse racing events with 8+ runners qualify for 1\u002F4 or 1\u002F5 place terms",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1449,"children":1450},{},[1451],{"type":81,"value":1452},"You want a realistic chance of covering the increased stake on a bad day",{"type":75,"tag":1429,"props":1454,"children":1456},{"id":1455},"when-each-way-fails",[1457],{"type":81,"value":1458},"When Each-Way Fails",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1460,"children":1461},{},[1462,1464,1469],{"type":81,"value":1463},"Each-way does ",{"type":75,"tag":108,"props":1465,"children":1466},{},[1467],{"type":81,"value":1468},"not",{"type":81,"value":1470}," make sense on football, tennis, or other sports without place markets, and it doesn't make sense on heavy favourites under 2.5 — the place portion returns too little to justify doubling the outlay. A £14 each-way Patent on 3 picks at 1.8 is almost pure dead weight. The 3 place-portion singles return close to stake regardless of whether the horse wins, places, or loses by a nose, and the doubles and treble on the place side barely compound.",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":1472,"children":1474},{"id":1473},"rule-4-deductions",[1475],{"type":81,"value":1476},"Rule 4 Deductions",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1478,"children":1479},{},[1480],{"type":81,"value":1481},"Rule 4 applies to UK horse racing when a runner is withdrawn after you place the bet. The bookmaker deducts a set amount per pound from winning returns on every line that included the affected race. A 20p Rule 4 on a line paying £10 means you collect £10 − £2 = £8.",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1483,"children":1484},{},[1485],{"type":81,"value":1486},"Critically, Rule 4 applies to both Trixie and Patent but affects different numbers of lines. On a Trixie, any race where a runner is withdrawn affects up to 3 lines (the 2 doubles and the treble containing that leg). On a Patent, the same withdrawal affects up to 4 lines (1 single, 2 doubles, 1 treble). That's why Patent returns can dip slightly more than Trixie returns in heavy-withdrawal meetings — more lines to deduct from.",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":1488,"children":1490},{"id":1489},"void-legs-and-re-pricing",[1491],{"type":81,"value":1492},"Void Legs and Re-Pricing",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1494,"children":1495},{},[1496],{"type":81,"value":1497},"If a selection is void (non-runner, game cancelled, race abandoned), the line containing that leg re-prices. On a Trixie, the treble becomes a double at the two surviving odds, and a double containing the voided leg collapses to a single on the remaining leg at face-value odds. On a Patent, additionally the single on the voided leg is refunded at stake.",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1499,"children":1500},{},[1501],{"type":81,"value":1502},"Some books apply the \"reduced-to-1.0\" rule instead, treating the void as a break-even multiplier. That rule makes the Patent's 1 refunded single more valuable (you get the stake back) but the Trixie loses slightly more structure because it has fewer surviving lines to fall back on. Check the bookmaker's T&Cs for the exact handling — William Hill, bet365 and Betfair all document this differently.",{"type":75,"tag":76,"props":1504,"children":1506},{"id":1505},"common-trixie-and-patent-mistakes",[1507],{"type":81,"value":1508},"Common Trixie and Patent Mistakes",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1510,"children":1511},{},[1512],{"type":81,"value":1513},"Every one of these mistakes appears in bookmaker transaction data. Trixie and Patent losers don't usually lose because the format is bad — they lose because of these specific errors.",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":1515,"children":1517},{"id":1516},"treating-per-line-stake-as-total-stake",[1518],{"type":81,"value":1519},"Treating Per-Line Stake as Total Stake",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1521,"children":1522},{},[1523],{"type":81,"value":1524},"The most common mistake on both formats. Every bookmaker asks for per-line stake (usually defaulting to £1), and the total outlay is that stake multiplied by 4 for a Trixie or 7 for a Patent. Punters new to these bets type \"£10\" thinking it means \"my total is £10,\" and see £40 or £70 deducted.",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1526,"children":1527},{},[1528],{"type":81,"value":1529},"Every bookmaker confirms the total on the slip before submission — read the \"Total Stake\" field, not just the \"Stake\" field. If the total shocks you, cut your per-line stake before tapping confirm. The rule is dead simple: multiply your per-line number by 4 (Trixie) or 7 (Patent) in your head before pressing submit.",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":1531,"children":1533},{"id":1532},"picking-heavy-favourites-below-20",[1534],{"type":81,"value":1535},"Picking Heavy Favourites Below 2.0",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1537,"children":1538},{},[1539],{"type":81,"value":1540},"Three selections at 1.50 on a £1 Patent: total stake £7, maximum return (all 3 win) = 3 × 1.5 + 3 × 2.25 + 1 × 3.375 = £14.63. Even with every pick landing, you clear £7.63 net on £7 outlay. Adjusted for bookmaker margin and the non-trivial risk of one \"safe\" pick losing, expected value is negative.",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1542,"children":1543},{},[1544,1546,1552],{"type":81,"value":1545},"Heavy favourites belong on a short treble or as separate singles, not a Trixie or Patent. The compounding benefit of doubles and the treble is too weak when individual odds are low, and the Patent's singles don't earn their £3 premium on prices below 2.0. The ",{"type":75,"tag":99,"props":1547,"children":1549},{"href":1548},"\u002Fblog\u002Fyankee-bet-calculator-strategy",[1550],{"type":81,"value":1551},"Yankee calculator strategy guide",{"type":81,"value":1553}," shows the same pattern at 4 selections — longer odds favour more complex systems, short odds kill them.",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":1555,"children":1557},{"id":1556},"ignoring-bookmaker-bonus-fine-print",[1558],{"type":81,"value":1559},"Ignoring Bookmaker Bonus Fine Print",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1561,"children":1562},{},[1563],{"type":81,"value":1564},"The 2x-4x single-winner bonus on a Patent looks amazing on paper, but the fine print usually excludes each-way bets, minimum runner counts, and \"non-runner no bet\" race types. Before committing to a Patent because of the headline bonus, check: does it apply to your specific selections? Is the minimum odds restriction 2.0 or 1.5? Are any races below the runner-count threshold?",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1566,"children":1567},{},[1568],{"type":81,"value":1569},"Missing these terms turns an expected +EV bonus into a standard payout — and on a bet sized for the bonus, that's a real financial hit. Model the Patent bonus scenarios before placing, so you see the actual return with and without the bonus triggered.",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":1571,"children":1573},{"id":1572},"using-a-trixie-on-high-odds-long-shots",[1574],{"type":81,"value":1575},"Using a Trixie on High-Odds Long Shots",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1577,"children":1578},{},[1579],{"type":81,"value":1580},"The symmetric mistake to picking favourites on a Patent: using a Trixie on 3 picks priced 5.0+. At those odds the singles layer on a Patent is worth far more than £3, but the Trixie format leaves that money on the table. Three picks at 6.0 imply a 16.7% per-leg hit rate, and 0.167³ = 0.46% chance of all 3 landing. At those probabilities, you need the singles to catch any return at all — which is exactly what a Trixie doesn't have.",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1582,"children":1583},{},[1584],{"type":81,"value":1585},"Rule of thumb: above per-leg odds of 4.0, consider abandoning the Trixie for the Patent (or even a Lucky 15 if you can stretch to 4 selections) because the singles layer is doing most of the EV work at that price band.",{"type":75,"tag":76,"props":1587,"children":1589},{"id":1588},"see-your-trixie-vs-patent-payout-interactive-explorer",[1590],{"type":81,"value":1591},"See Your Trixie vs Patent Payout: Interactive Explorer",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1593,"children":1594},{},[1595,1597,1602],{"type":81,"value":1596},"Below is a stripped-down educational tool: pick three sample selections at 3.00 odds each, toggle them W\u002FL, and watch which of the Trixie's 4 lines and the Patent's 7 lines survive. It's not a full calculator — for that, use ",{"type":75,"tag":99,"props":1598,"children":1599},{"href":101},[1600],{"type":81,"value":1601},"our system bet tool",{"type":81,"value":1603},". This one is designed to make the 1-winner Patent rescue visual.",{"type":75,"tag":1605,"props":1606,"children":1607},"inline-trixie-vs-patent-explorer",{},[],{"type":75,"tag":76,"props":1609,"children":1611},{"id":1610},"when-lucky-15-yankee-or-a-straight-treble-makes-more-sense",[1612],{"type":81,"value":1613},"When Lucky 15, Yankee, or a Straight Treble Makes More Sense",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1615,"children":1616},{},[1617],{"type":81,"value":1618},"Trixie and Patent are not always the right choice. Both wrap 3 selections, and sometimes 3 isn't the right size of slate. Here's when to reach for a different format entirely.",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":1620,"children":1622},{"id":1621},"go-bigger-lucky-15-or-yankee-at-4-selections",[1623],{"type":81,"value":1624},"Go Bigger: Lucky 15 or Yankee at 4 Selections",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1626,"children":1627},{},[1628],{"type":81,"value":1629},"If you have 4 strong picks instead of 3, the 4-selection equivalents (Lucky 15 and Yankee) unlock more combinations. A Yankee is to a Trixie what Lucky 15 is to a Patent — same structural trade-off, one size up. With 4 selections:",{"type":75,"tag":260,"props":1631,"children":1632},{},[1633,1643],{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1634,"children":1635},{},[1636,1641],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":1637,"children":1638},{},[1639],{"type":81,"value":1640},"Yankee",{"type":81,"value":1642}," = 11 lines (6 doubles + 4 trebles + 1 four-fold), no singles, min 2 winners — the 4-leg equivalent of a Trixie",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1644,"children":1645},{},[1646,1651],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":1647,"children":1648},{},[1649],{"type":81,"value":1650},"Lucky 15",{"type":81,"value":1652}," = 15 lines (4 singles + 6 doubles + 4 trebles + 1 four-fold), min 1 winner — the 4-leg equivalent of a Patent",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1654,"children":1655},{},[1656],{"type":81,"value":1657},"The upside compounds faster because 4-leg trebles and the four-fold price higher than 3-leg combinations, but the total outlay scales too (Yankee £11, Lucky 15 £15 at £1 per line). If you're drawn to Patents for the singles safety net and you have a 4th pick at similar confidence, the Lucky 15 is usually the logical next step.",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":1659,"children":1661},{"id":1660},"go-smaller-straight-treble-or-three-singles",[1662],{"type":81,"value":1663},"Go Smaller: Straight Treble or Three Singles",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1665,"children":1666},{},[1667],{"type":81,"value":1668},"If you're extremely confident in all 3 picks — per-leg hit rate above 60% — a straight treble at the same £4 total as a Trixie actually compounds harder on the 3-winner outcome. The trade-off is that a straight treble returns £0 on any non-perfect slate, where a Trixie returns on 2-winner slates.",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1670,"children":1671},{},[1672],{"type":81,"value":1673},"If you're only confident on individual picks but not on combinations, 3 separate singles at £1-£2 each can outperform either system bet. You're giving up the compounding benefit of doubles and the treble, but you're also not paying for combinations you don't believe in.",{"type":75,"tag":127,"props":1675,"children":1677},{"id":1676},"quick-decision-framework",[1678],{"type":81,"value":1679},"Quick Decision Framework",{"type":75,"tag":260,"props":1681,"children":1682},{},[1683,1693,1702,1711,1721],{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1684,"children":1685},{},[1686,1691],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":1687,"children":1688},{},[1689],{"type":81,"value":1690},"Straight treble",{"type":81,"value":1692}," — very high confidence on all 3, per-leg odds 2.5+, and you're comfortable with all-or-nothing",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1694,"children":1695},{},[1696,1700],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":1697,"children":1698},{},[1699],{"type":81,"value":178},{"type":81,"value":1701}," — confident 2+ win, per-leg odds below 2.5, no bookmaker bonus available",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1703,"children":1704},{},[1705,1709],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":1706,"children":1707},{},[1708],{"type":81,"value":201},{"type":81,"value":1710}," — want 1-winner safety, per-leg odds above 2.5, bookmaker bonus in play",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1712,"children":1713},{},[1714,1719],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":1715,"children":1716},{},[1717],{"type":81,"value":1718},"Lucky 15 or Yankee",{"type":81,"value":1720}," — you have 4 picks instead of 3 at similar confidence",{"type":75,"tag":264,"props":1722,"children":1723},{},[1724,1729],{"type":75,"tag":224,"props":1725,"children":1726},{},[1727],{"type":81,"value":1728},"3 separate singles",{"type":81,"value":1730}," — no confidence in combinations, just individual picks",{"type":75,"tag":83,"props":1732,"children":1733},{},[1734,1736,1741,1743,1748],{"type":81,"value":1735},"For a deeper walk-through on how to price any of these manually, ",{"type":75,"tag":99,"props":1737,"children":1738},{"href":470},[1739],{"type":81,"value":1740},"the step-by-step system bet calculation guide",{"type":81,"value":1742}," covers the combinatorial math for every popular format. Or drop the numbers into ",{"type":75,"tag":99,"props":1744,"children":1745},{"href":101},[1746],{"type":81,"value":1747},"our free calculator",{"type":81,"value":1749}," and skip the algebra — it handles Trixie, Patent, Yankee, Lucky 15, and the rest in the same interface.",{"type":75,"tag":76,"props":1751,"children":1753},{"id":1752},"faq",[1754],{"type":81,"value":1755},"FAQ"]