TG

Gambler's Fallacy Simulator

Interactive demonstration that proves past results don't affect future outcomes. Watch thousands of spins and see the truth about probability.

The roulette wheel has no memory. After 10 reds in a row, the probability of red on the next spin is still 48.65% - not lower, not higher.

Select Game

Speed:

Results History

0 spins
Click 'Spin' or 'Auto Spin' to start

Streak Statistics

Current Streak
0
Longest Streak
0

Distribution

Red
0.0% (48.65%)
Black
0.0% (48.65%)
Zero
0.0% (2.7%)
Total Spins0

Key Takeaway

No matter how many times one outcome appears, the next result is always independent. The universe doesn't 'owe' you a different result. Each spin is a fresh start with the same probabilities.

Understanding the Gambler's Fallacy

The Gambler's Fallacy is one of the most common and costly cognitive biases in gambling. It's the mistaken belief that if something happens more frequently than expected during a period, it will happen less frequently in the future (or vice versa). This simulator lets you witness firsthand why this belief is mathematically wrong.

Why Our Brains Fall for This Trap

Humans are pattern-seeking creatures. When we see 10 reds in a row, our brain screams that black is 'due.' This feeling is so strong it can override logical thinking. But here's the truth: each roulette spin, coin flip, or dice roll is an independent event. The wheel has no memory. The coin doesn't know what happened before. The probability is reset to baseline every single time.

The Monte Carlo Casino Incident

In 1913, at the Monte Carlo Casino, the ball fell on black 26 times in a row. Gamblers lost millions betting on red, convinced it was 'due.' The probability of 26 blacks in a row is about 1 in 66 million - but once 25 blacks had already occurred, the 26th spin still had only a 48.65% chance of being black. Past results provided zero predictive value. This event is why the Gambler's Fallacy is sometimes called the 'Monte Carlo Fallacy.'

Written by

author-credentials.sysE-E-A-T
Evgeniy Volkov

Evgeny Volkov

Verified Expert
Math & Software Engineer, iGaming Expert

Over 10 years developing software for the gaming industry. Advanced degree in Mathematics. Specializing in probability analysis, RNG algorithms, and mathematical gambling models.

Experience10+
SpecializationiGaming
Status
Active
FAQ

FAQ

The Gambler's Fallacy is the mistaken belief that past random events affect future random events. For example, thinking that after 10 coin flips landing heads, tails is 'more likely' next time. In reality, each flip has a 50/50 chance regardless of history.
Our brains evolved to find patterns and expect regression to the mean over time. While it's true that over thousands of trials results will average out, this doesn't mean individual outcomes become more or less likely based on recent history. Each event is independent.
Not directly, but casinos benefit when players make irrational decisions based on this fallacy. Players who chase 'due' numbers or outcomes often bet more emotionally, abandon strategies, and make statistically worse choices - all of which increases the casino's edge.
In truly independent random events (like roulette, dice, or coin flips), no. However, in games with dependent events like blackjack (where cards are removed from the deck), past outcomes do affect future probabilities. This is the principle behind card counting.
Remind yourself before each bet that the outcome is independent. Watch this simulator and see how streaks happen randomly without any 'correction.' Set betting limits in advance and don't change them based on recent results. If you feel something is 'due,' recognize that feeling as a cognitive bias, not insight.