TG
term-metadata.sys
SectionCasino
Categoryrtp-variance
DifficultyBeginner
Status
VERIFIED
Related5 terms
UpdatedFeb 2026

Martingale

martingale systemdoubling strategydouble-up systemnegative progression
> Contents
Definition

The Martingale is a negative progression betting system where stakes are doubled after each loss to recover previous losses plus one unit profit upon winning. While mathematically seductive—you 'always win eventually'—the system fails due to table limits, bankroll constraints, and exponential bet growth. A 10-bet losing streak requires 1,024 units, turning a $10 base bet into a $10,240 wager. The house edge remains unchanged; Martingale only restructures when losses occur, not whether they occur.

Martingale System

Martingale is gambling's most famous and most dangerous illusion. The premise is intoxicating: double your bet after every loss, and when you finally win, you'll recover everything plus profit. It works—until it doesn't. The system creates a seductive pattern of frequent small wins that mask inevitable catastrophic losses. Casinos don't fear Martingale; they welcome it. The math guarantees their edge remains intact regardless of how bets are sized.

Table of Contents

How Martingale Works {#how-it-works}

The Basic Principle

Next Bet=2×Previous Bet (after loss)\text{Next Bet} = 2 \times \text{Previous Bet} \text{ (after loss)} Next Bet=Base Bet (after win)\text{Next Bet} = \text{Base Bet} \text{ (after win)}

Step-by-Step Example

Starting with $10 base bet:

RoundBetResultRunning P/LTotal Risked
1$10Lose-$10$10
2$20Lose-$30$30
3$40Lose-$70$70
4$80Lose-$150$150
5$160Win+$10$310

Result: You risked 310toprofit310 to profit 10.

Why It "Seems" to Work

After a win, you've recovered all losses plus 1 unit profit:

Profit=Winning Bet(Previous Losses)=Base Bet\text{Profit} = \text{Winning Bet} - \sum(\text{Previous Losses}) = \text{Base Bet}
Losses Before WinTotal RecoveryNet Profit
0$10$10
370+70 + 80$10
5310+310 + 320$10
71,270+1,270 + 1,280$10

Same profit regardless of losing streak length—this is the seduction.

The Mathematics {#math}

Exponential Growth of Bets

Required Bet after N losses=Base Bet×2N\text{Required Bet after N losses} = \text{Base Bet} \times 2^N
LossesBet RequiredCumulative Risk
12 units2 units
38 units14 units
532 units62 units
7128 units254 units
101,024 units2,046 units
1532,768 units65,534 units

A 10basebetbecomes10 base bet becomes 327,680 after 15 losses.

Probability of Losing Streaks

P(N consecutive losses)=(1Pwin)NP(\text{N consecutive losses}) = (1 - P_{win})^N

European Roulette (red/black, 48.65% win):

StreakProbability1 in X
53.45%29
70.86%116
100.13%784
120.03%3,107
150.004%24,380

Expected Number of Streaks

Expected Streaks=Total Bets×P(Streak)\text{Expected Streaks} = \text{Total Bets} \times P(\text{Streak})
BetsExpected 7+ StreaksExpected 10+ Streaks
1000.860.13
5004.30.64
1,0008.61.28
10,0008612.8

After 1,000 bets, you'll likely have experienced a 10+ losing streak.

The Fundamental Math Problem

EV (Martingale)=EV (Flat Betting)=House Edge×Total Wagered\text{EV (Martingale)} = \text{EV (Flat Betting)} = -\text{House Edge} \times \text{Total Wagered}

Critical insight: Martingale doesn't change expected value—it only changes result distribution.

Why Martingale Fails {#why-it-fails}

Failure Point 1: Table Limits

CasinoMin BetMax BetMax Doubles
Low-limit$5$5006-7
Standard$10$2,0007-8
High-limit$25$10,0008-9

**After 8 doubles at 10:10:** 2,560 required, exceeds $2,000 limit. Game over.

Failure Point 2: Bankroll Exhaustion

Required bankroll for N losing streak survival:

Bankroll Needed=Base Bet×(2N1)\text{Bankroll Needed} = \text{Base Bet} \times (2^N - 1)
Streaks to SurviveBankroll Needed ($10 base)
5$310
7$1,270
10$10,230
12$40,950

Surviving 10 losses requires 1,000x your base bet in reserve.

Failure Point 3: Risk/Reward Imbalance

OutcomeProbabilityResult
Win within 10 bets99.87%+$10
Lose 10+ in a row0.13%-$10,230

Expected value per "session":

\text{EV} = (0.9987 \times 10) - (0.0013 \times 10,230) = 9.987 - 13.30 = -$3.31

You lose on average—even with 99.87% "win rate."

Failure Point 4: Time and Opportunity Cost

MetricMartingaleFlat Betting
Average bet sizeEscalatingConstant
Time per sessionLongFlexible
Stress levelHighLow
Same expected lossYesYes

Simulation Results {#simulation}

10,000 Session Simulation

Settings: $10 base bet, 8 max doubles, European roulette (48.65%)

MetricResult
Sessions won9,874 (98.74%)
Sessions lost126 (1.26%)
Average win+$42
Average loss-$2,550
Net result-$68,946
Net per session-$6.89

Comparison to Flat Betting

Same total wagered, flat $100 bets:

MetricMartingaleFlat Betting
Winning sessions98.74%~50%
Average session result-$6.89-$2.70
Maximum loss-$2,550-$100
VarianceExtremeLow
Same EV?YesYes

Long-Term Outcome Distribution

Outcome RangeMartingaleFlat Betting
Big win (+$500+)0.1%0.5%
Small win (+$1-500)98.6%25%
Small loss (-$1-500)0%74%
Big loss (-$500+)1.3%0.5%

Martingale concentrates losses into rare catastrophic events.

Martingale Variations {#variations}

Reverse Martingale (Paroli)

Rule: Double after wins, reset after loss

AspectStandardReverse
After lossDoubleReset to base
After winReset to baseDouble
Risk profileFrequent small wins, rare big lossFrequent small losses, rare big win
EVNegativeNegative

Grand Martingale

Rule: Double plus one unit after loss

RoundStandardGrand
1$10$10
2$20$30
3$40$70
4$80$150
5$160$310

Higher profit per win, faster bankroll depletion.

Modified Martingale

Rule: Stop after N losses

Max LossesWin RateMax LossEV Change
393.1%$70Same
598.2%$310Same
799.5%$1,270Same

Limiting losses doesn't change EV—just redistributes risk.

Mini-Martingale

Rule: 1.5x instead of 2x

Round2x1.5x
5$160$76
10$5,120$576

Slower growth, same fundamental problem.

Comparison Table

VariationRisk ReductionEV ImpactPractical?
StandardNoneNegativeNo
ReverseLower varianceNegativeSlightly better
GrandWorseMore negativeNo
ModifiedLoss capsSame negativeNo
MiniSlower growthSame negativeNo

All variations have negative expected value.

Psychological Traps {#psychology}

Trap 1: The "Always Win" Illusion

98%+ of sessions end in profit. This creates false confidence:

SessionsLikely Profit SessionsLikely Bust Sessions
109-100-1
5049-500-1
10098-991-2

After 50 winning sessions, you "know" the system works.

Trap 2: Survivorship Bias

StoryReality
"I've won $500 with Martingale"Doesn't mention eventual $2,000+ loss
"My friend uses it successfully"Small sample, hasn't hit streak yet
"It works if you're disciplined"Discipline doesn't change math

Trap 3: Gambler's Fallacy Integration

The fallacy: "I've lost 5 in a row, a win is due" The Martingale amplifies this by making you bet more when "certain" of winning.

Reality: Each spin is independent. Previous results don't affect future outcomes.

Trap 4: Sunk Cost Escalation

After 5 losses (-310),thethought:"IMUSTbet310), the thought: "I MUST bet 320 to recover" This ignores that the $310 is already gone—each bet should be evaluated independently.

Martingale on Different Games {#games}

European Roulette (Even Money)

MetricValue
Win probability48.65%
House edge2.70%
10-loss streak odds1 in 784
Martingale EV-2.70% of total wagered

American Roulette (Even Money)

MetricValue
Win probability47.37%
House edge5.26%
10-loss streak odds1 in 608
Martingale EV-5.26% of total wagered

Worse game = worse Martingale results

Blackjack

MetricValue
Win probability~42.5% (not even money)
House edge0.5% with basic strategy
ProblemWins aren't always 1:1

Martingale poorly suited—blackjack has splits, doubles, blackjack payouts.

Baccarat (Banker)

MetricValue
Win probability45.86%
House edge1.06%
Issue5% commission on wins

Martingale works poorly with commission structures.

The Bottom Line {#conclusion}

What Martingale Actually Does

ClaimReality
"Guarantees wins"Guarantees eventual catastrophic loss
"Beats the house"House edge applies to every bet
"Works with discipline"Math doesn't care about discipline
"Safe with limits"Limits just delay the inevitable

Expected Outcome Over Time

Long-Term Result=House Edge×Total Wagered\text{Long-Term Result} = -\text{House Edge} \times \text{Total Wagered}

Regardless of betting system. Always. Without exception.

When to Use Martingale

Answer: Never for expected profit

If you want...Better strategy
EntertainmentFlat betting, accept losses
Best oddsLow house edge games, optimal strategy
ProfitBecome the casino

Final Verdict

Martingale is mathematically equivalent to:

  1. Winning $10 frequently
  2. Losing $10,000+ rarely
  3. Net loss over time = house edge

It's a repackaging of the same losing proposition with extra stress and bankroll requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

author-credentials.sysE-E-A-T
Evgeniy Volkov

Evgeny Volkov

Verified Expert
Math & Software Engineer, iGaming Expert

Over 10 years developing software for the gaming industry. Advanced degree in Mathematics. Specializing in probability analysis, RNG algorithms, and mathematical gambling models.

Experience10+
SpecializationiGaming
Status
Active
related-calculators.sys
related-terms.sys

Related Terms

launch-tools.sh

Explore More Tools

Put theory into practice with our free calculators.