> Contents
18+
The Martingale is a negative progression betting system where stakes are doubled after each loss to recover previous losses plus one unit profit upon winning. While mathematically seductive—you 'always win eventually'—the system fails due to table limits, bankroll constraints, and exponential bet growth. A 10-bet losing streak requires 1,024 units, turning a $10 base bet into a $10,240 wager. The house edge remains unchanged; Martingale only restructures when losses occur, not whether they occur.
Martingale System
Martingale is gambling's most famous and most dangerous illusion. The premise is intoxicating: double your bet after every loss, and when you finally win, you'll recover everything plus profit. It works—until it doesn't. The system creates a seductive pattern of frequent small wins that mask inevitable catastrophic losses. Casinos don't fear Martingale; they welcome it. The math guarantees their edge remains intact regardless of how bets are sized.
Table of Contents
- How Martingale Works
- The Mathematics
- Why Martingale Fails
- Simulation Results
- Martingale Variations
- Psychological Traps
- The Bottom Line
How Martingale Works {#how-it-works}
The Basic Principle
Step-by-Step Example
Starting with $10 base bet:
| Round | Bet | Result | Running P/L | Total Risked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $10 | Lose | -$10 | $10 |
| 2 | $20 | Lose | -$30 | $30 |
| 3 | $40 | Lose | -$70 | $70 |
| 4 | $80 | Lose | -$150 | $150 |
| 5 | $160 | Win | +$10 | $310 |
Result: You risked 10.
Why It "Seems" to Work
After a win, you've recovered all losses plus 1 unit profit:
| Losses Before Win | Total Recovery | Net Profit |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | $10 | $10 |
| 3 | 80 | $10 |
| 5 | 320 | $10 |
| 7 | 1,280 | $10 |
Same profit regardless of losing streak length—this is the seduction.
The Mathematics {#math}
Exponential Growth of Bets
| Losses | Bet Required | Cumulative Risk |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 units | 2 units |
| 3 | 8 units | 14 units |
| 5 | 32 units | 62 units |
| 7 | 128 units | 254 units |
| 10 | 1,024 units | 2,046 units |
| 15 | 32,768 units | 65,534 units |
A 327,680 after 15 losses.
Probability of Losing Streaks
European Roulette (red/black, 48.65% win):
| Streak | Probability | 1 in X |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 3.45% | 29 |
| 7 | 0.86% | 116 |
| 10 | 0.13% | 784 |
| 12 | 0.03% | 3,107 |
| 15 | 0.004% | 24,380 |
Expected Number of Streaks
| Bets | Expected 7+ Streaks | Expected 10+ Streaks |
|---|---|---|
| 100 | 0.86 | 0.13 |
| 500 | 4.3 | 0.64 |
| 1,000 | 8.6 | 1.28 |
| 10,000 | 86 | 12.8 |
After 1,000 bets, you'll likely have experienced a 10+ losing streak.
The Fundamental Math Problem
Critical insight: Martingale doesn't change expected value—it only changes result distribution.
Why Martingale Fails {#why-it-fails}
Failure Point 1: Table Limits
| Casino | Min Bet | Max Bet | Max Doubles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low-limit | $5 | $500 | 6-7 |
| Standard | $10 | $2,000 | 7-8 |
| High-limit | $25 | $10,000 | 8-9 |
**After 8 doubles at 2,560 required, exceeds $2,000 limit. Game over.
Failure Point 2: Bankroll Exhaustion
Required bankroll for N losing streak survival:
| Streaks to Survive | Bankroll Needed ($10 base) |
|---|---|
| 5 | $310 |
| 7 | $1,270 |
| 10 | $10,230 |
| 12 | $40,950 |
Surviving 10 losses requires 1,000x your base bet in reserve.
Failure Point 3: Risk/Reward Imbalance
| Outcome | Probability | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Win within 10 bets | 99.87% | +$10 |
| Lose 10+ in a row | 0.13% | -$10,230 |
Expected value per "session":
\text{EV} = (0.9987 \times 10) - (0.0013 \times 10,230) = 9.987 - 13.30 = -$3.31You lose on average—even with 99.87% "win rate."
Failure Point 4: Time and Opportunity Cost
| Metric | Martingale | Flat Betting |
|---|---|---|
| Average bet size | Escalating | Constant |
| Time per session | Long | Flexible |
| Stress level | High | Low |
| Same expected loss | Yes | Yes |
Simulation Results {#simulation}
10,000 Session Simulation
Settings: $10 base bet, 8 max doubles, European roulette (48.65%)
| Metric | Result |
|---|---|
| Sessions won | 9,874 (98.74%) |
| Sessions lost | 126 (1.26%) |
| Average win | +$42 |
| Average loss | -$2,550 |
| Net result | -$68,946 |
| Net per session | -$6.89 |
Comparison to Flat Betting
Same total wagered, flat $100 bets:
| Metric | Martingale | Flat Betting |
|---|---|---|
| Winning sessions | 98.74% | ~50% |
| Average session result | -$6.89 | -$2.70 |
| Maximum loss | -$2,550 | -$100 |
| Variance | Extreme | Low |
| Same EV? | Yes | Yes |
Long-Term Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Range | Martingale | Flat Betting |
|---|---|---|
| Big win (+$500+) | 0.1% | 0.5% |
| Small win (+$1-500) | 98.6% | 25% |
| Small loss (-$1-500) | 0% | 74% |
| Big loss (-$500+) | 1.3% | 0.5% |
Martingale concentrates losses into rare catastrophic events.
Martingale Variations {#variations}
Reverse Martingale (Paroli)
Rule: Double after wins, reset after loss
| Aspect | Standard | Reverse |
|---|---|---|
| After loss | Double | Reset to base |
| After win | Reset to base | Double |
| Risk profile | Frequent small wins, rare big loss | Frequent small losses, rare big win |
| EV | Negative | Negative |
Grand Martingale
Rule: Double plus one unit after loss
| Round | Standard | Grand |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | $10 | $10 |
| 2 | $20 | $30 |
| 3 | $40 | $70 |
| 4 | $80 | $150 |
| 5 | $160 | $310 |
Higher profit per win, faster bankroll depletion.
Modified Martingale
Rule: Stop after N losses
| Max Losses | Win Rate | Max Loss | EV Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 93.1% | $70 | Same |
| 5 | 98.2% | $310 | Same |
| 7 | 99.5% | $1,270 | Same |
Limiting losses doesn't change EV—just redistributes risk.
Mini-Martingale
Rule: 1.5x instead of 2x
| Round | 2x | 1.5x |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | $160 | $76 |
| 10 | $5,120 | $576 |
Slower growth, same fundamental problem.
Comparison Table
| Variation | Risk Reduction | EV Impact | Practical? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | None | Negative | No |
| Reverse | Lower variance | Negative | Slightly better |
| Grand | Worse | More negative | No |
| Modified | Loss caps | Same negative | No |
| Mini | Slower growth | Same negative | No |
All variations have negative expected value.
Psychological Traps {#psychology}
Trap 1: The "Always Win" Illusion
98%+ of sessions end in profit. This creates false confidence:
| Sessions | Likely Profit Sessions | Likely Bust Sessions |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 9-10 | 0-1 |
| 50 | 49-50 | 0-1 |
| 100 | 98-99 | 1-2 |
After 50 winning sessions, you "know" the system works.
Trap 2: Survivorship Bias
| Story | Reality |
|---|---|
| "I've won $500 with Martingale" | Doesn't mention eventual $2,000+ loss |
| "My friend uses it successfully" | Small sample, hasn't hit streak yet |
| "It works if you're disciplined" | Discipline doesn't change math |
Trap 3: Gambler's Fallacy Integration
The fallacy: "I've lost 5 in a row, a win is due" The Martingale amplifies this by making you bet more when "certain" of winning.
Reality: Each spin is independent. Previous results don't affect future outcomes.
Trap 4: Sunk Cost Escalation
After 5 losses (-320 to recover" This ignores that the $310 is already gone—each bet should be evaluated independently.
Martingale on Different Games {#games}
European Roulette (Even Money)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Win probability | 48.65% |
| House edge | 2.70% |
| 10-loss streak odds | 1 in 784 |
| Martingale EV | -2.70% of total wagered |
American Roulette (Even Money)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Win probability | 47.37% |
| House edge | 5.26% |
| 10-loss streak odds | 1 in 608 |
| Martingale EV | -5.26% of total wagered |
Worse game = worse Martingale results
Blackjack
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Win probability | ~42.5% (not even money) |
| House edge | 0.5% with basic strategy |
| Problem | Wins aren't always 1:1 |
Martingale poorly suited—blackjack has splits, doubles, blackjack payouts.
Baccarat (Banker)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Win probability | 45.86% |
| House edge | 1.06% |
| Issue | 5% commission on wins |
Martingale works poorly with commission structures.
The Bottom Line {#conclusion}
What Martingale Actually Does
| Claim | Reality |
|---|---|
| "Guarantees wins" | Guarantees eventual catastrophic loss |
| "Beats the house" | House edge applies to every bet |
| "Works with discipline" | Math doesn't care about discipline |
| "Safe with limits" | Limits just delay the inevitable |
Expected Outcome Over Time
Regardless of betting system. Always. Without exception.
When to Use Martingale
Answer: Never for expected profit
| If you want... | Better strategy |
|---|---|
| Entertainment | Flat betting, accept losses |
| Best odds | Low house edge games, optimal strategy |
| Profit | Become the casino |
Final Verdict
Martingale is mathematically equivalent to:
- Winning $10 frequently
- Losing $10,000+ rarely
- Net loss over time = house edge
It's a repackaging of the same losing proposition with extra stress and bankroll requirements.
Related Calculators
- Martingale Simulator - See why it fails
- Bankroll Calculator - Understand requirements
- Session Simulator - Compare to flat betting
Frequently Asked Questions
Bonus allocation is limited per region. Claim before capacity runs out.



Related Calculators
Related Terms
Explore More Tools
Put theory into practice with our free calculators.
