> Contents
18+
Closing Line Value (CLV) measures whether you beat the market by comparing the odds at which you placed your bet to the final odds before the event started. Positive CLV indicates you secured better odds than the market's final assessment, which is the strongest predictor of long-term betting profitability. Professional bettors track CLV as their primary performance metric because it reflects true edge regardless of short-term variance.
Closing Line Value (CLV)
Closing Line Value measures whether you beat the market. It compares your betting odds to the final (closing) odds—the market's most accurate assessment of true probability. If you consistently get better odds than the closing line, you have edge. If you don't, you're fighting against the market's wisdom. CLV is the single best predictor of long-term betting success because it reflects your actual skill at finding value, independent of luck.
Table of Contents
- Why CLV Matters
- Calculating CLV
- CLV Methods
- Interpreting Your CLV
- CLV vs Actual Profit
- Improving Your CLV
- Common Mistakes
Why CLV Matters {#why-clv-matters}
The betting market is a prediction machine. Thousands of bettors and bookmakers contribute information, and by closing time, the line reflects the collective wisdom of the market. The closing line is the most accurate available probability estimate.
The Logic
| Timing | Information Level | Line Accuracy |
|---|---|---|
| Days before | Limited | Lower |
| Hours before | Growing | Medium |
| Minutes before | Near-complete | High |
| At close | Maximum | Highest |
If you bet at odds better than closing, you beat the market's best estimate.
Professional Perspective
Why pros track CLV, not just profit:
| Scenario | Profit | CLV | What It Means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lucky bettor | +15% | -3% | Winning by variance, will lose long-term |
| Unlucky sharp | -5% | +2% | Edge exists, profits coming |
| True sharp | +8% | +3% | Sustainable edge, sustainable profit |
| Losing bettor | -12% | -4% | No edge, losing as expected |
Short-term results lie. CLV tells the truth.
Calculating CLV {#calculation}
Basic CLV Formula (Odds Method)
Example:
- You bet: Team A at 2.20
- Closing odds: Team A at 2.00
You secured 10% better odds than the market's final price.
CLV Formula (Implied Probability Method)
Where Implied Probability = 1 / Decimal Odds
Example:
- Your odds: 2.20 → Implied prob = 45.45%
- Closing odds: 2.00 → Implied prob = 50.00%
No-Vig Closing Line
For accurate CLV, use no-vig closing odds (remove bookmaker margin):
Example with margin:
- Team A closes at 1.90 (implied 52.6%)
- Team B closes at 2.00 (implied 50.0%)
- Total: 102.6% (2.6% margin)
No-vig calculation:
- True prob A = 52.6% / 102.6% = 51.3%
- No-vig odds A = 1 / 0.513 = 1.95
Use 1.95 (not 1.90) for CLV calculation.
CLV Calculation Table
| Your Odds | Closing Odds | CLV % | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.50 | 2.00 | +25% | Excellent value captured |
| 2.20 | 2.00 | +10% | Strong positive CLV |
| 2.05 | 2.00 | +2.5% | Slight edge |
| 2.00 | 2.00 | 0% | No edge (market price) |
| 1.95 | 2.00 | -2.5% | Negative CLV |
| 1.80 | 2.00 | -10% | Significant negative CLV |
CLV Methods {#methods}
Method 1: Individual Bet CLV
Track CLV for each bet individually. Most precise but requires closing line data.
Tracking template:
| Date | Bet | Your Odds | Closing Odds | CLV % | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1 | Liverpool ML | 2.15 | 2.00 | +7.5% | Win |
| Jan 2 | Over 2.5 | 1.95 | 2.05 | -4.9% | Loss |
| Jan 3 | Draw | 3.50 | 3.20 | +9.4% | Win |
Method 2: Average CLV
Calculate mean CLV across all bets:
This smooths variance and shows your overall edge.
Method 3: Stake-Weighted CLV
Weight each CLV by stake size for more accurate assessment:
Method 4: Expected vs Actual CLV
Compare your expected CLV (theoretical) with actual results:
| Metric | Calculation | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Expected CLV | From odds movement | Theoretical edge |
| Realized CLV | From actual results | Actual edge captured |
| Variance | Expected - Realized | Luck factor |
Interpreting Your CLV {#interpreting}
CLV Benchmarks
| Average CLV | Interpretation | Expected Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| +5% or higher | Elite | Strong profits |
| +2% to +5% | Professional | Consistent profits |
| +0.5% to +2% | Slight edge | Marginal profits |
| -0.5% to +0.5% | No edge | Break-even minus margin |
| -0.5% to -2% | Negative edge | Consistent losses |
| Below -2% | Significant leak | Heavy losses |
CLV Sample Size
| Number of Bets | CLV Reliability |
|---|---|
| < 100 | Very low—high variance |
| 100-500 | Low—trends emerging |
| 500-1000 | Medium—meaningful data |
| 1000-5000 | High—reliable indicator |
| 5000+ | Very high—true edge visible |
Rule of thumb: Need 500+ bets minimum to trust CLV data.
Confidence Intervals
For 1000 bets with 3% average CLV:
- 95% confidence interval: approximately ±1.5%
- Your true CLV is likely between 1.5% and 4.5%
More bets = tighter confidence = clearer picture.
CLV vs Actual Profit {#clv-vs-profit}
Why They Diverge
Short-term results include variance. CLV measures pure edge.
Simulation: 1000 bettors with +3% CLV over 500 bets:
| Percentile | Profit/Loss | CLV |
|---|---|---|
| 5th (unlucky) | -8% | +3% |
| 25th | +1% | +3% |
| 50th (median) | +5% | +3% |
| 75th | +9% | +3% |
| 95th (lucky) | +18% | +3% |
Same edge, wildly different results. Over 5000 bets, these converge.
Expected Profit from CLV
Rough approximation:
- 3% CLV at 50% win rate ≈ 3% ROI
- 3% CLV at 33% win rate (underdogs) ≈ 2% ROI
- 3% CLV at 67% win rate (favorites) ≈ 4% ROI
Long-Term Convergence
| Time Period | CLV-Profit Correlation |
|---|---|
| 100 bets | ~0.3 (weak) |
| 500 bets | ~0.5 (moderate) |
| 1000 bets | ~0.7 (strong) |
| 5000 bets | ~0.9 (very strong) |
Patience required.
Improving Your CLV {#improving}
Strategy 1: Bet Early
Lines are softest when first released. Sharp action moves them.
| Timing | Typical Edge Available |
|---|---|
| Opening line | Highest |
| 24 hours before | High |
| 6 hours before | Medium |
| 1 hour before | Low |
| At closing | Zero by definition |
Strategy 2: Find Soft Bookmakers
Different books have different line quality:
| Bookmaker Type | Line Sharpness | CLV Opportunity |
|---|---|---|
| Sharp (Pinnacle) | Very high | Low |
| Medium books | Medium | Medium |
| Recreational books | Lower | Higher |
Bet at soft books, track against sharp closing lines.
Strategy 3: Specialize
Generalists face efficient markets. Specialists find edges:
| Approach | Market Efficiency | CLV Potential |
|---|---|---|
| Major leagues, mainstream markets | Very high | Low |
| Minor leagues, niche sports | Medium | Medium-High |
| Props, player markets | Lower | Higher |
Strategy 4: Speed
In liquid markets, value disappears quickly:
Automated alerts and quick execution preserve CLV.
Common Mistakes {#mistakes}
Mistake 1: Using Viggy Closing Lines
Comparing to closing odds that include margin inflates your CLV. Always use no-vig lines.
Wrong: Closed at 1.85, I bet at 1.90 = +2.7% CLV Right: No-vig close 1.95, I bet at 1.90 = -2.6% CLV
Mistake 2: Small Sample Conclusions
"I have +10% CLV over 50 bets, I'm crushing it!"
50 bets tells you almost nothing. Variance dominates. Wait for 500+.
Mistake 3: Ignoring Market Type
CLV meaning varies by market:
| Market | CLV Interpretation |
|---|---|
| Main markets | True CLV, accurate |
| Props | Can be misleading—less liquidity |
| Live betting | Harder to measure, more noise |
Mistake 4: Not Tracking Systematically
Selective tracking biases results. Track every bet, even the ones you'd rather forget.
Mistake 5: CLV Obsession Over EV
CLV is a proxy for expected value, not the goal itself. Sometimes:
- Low CLV bet is still +EV (inefficient closing line)
- High CLV bet was -EV (line moved wrong direction)
Use CLV as diagnostic tool, not religion.
CLV Tracking Tools {#tools}
What to Track
| Field | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Date/Time of bet | Timing analysis |
| Your odds | Your execution price |
| Closing odds | Market final price |
| Stake | For weighted calculations |
| Result | Actual outcome |
| Sport/League | Identify strongest edges |
| Market type | Isolate profitable markets |
Automated vs Manual
| Method | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Spreadsheet | Full control, custom analysis | Time-consuming |
| Betting tracker apps | Automated, convenient | Less flexibility |
| Bookmaker history | Easy access | Missing closing lines |
Related Calculators
- CLV Calculator - Calculate your closing line value
- Value Bet Calculator - Find positive expected value bets
- Kelly Calculator - Optimal stake sizing based on edge
Frequently Asked Questions
Bonus allocation is limited per region. Claim before capacity runs out.



Related Calculators
Explore More Tools
Put theory into practice with our free calculators.
