> Contents
18+
A stake is the amount of money wagered on a single bet—your financial risk on that specific outcome. Stake sizing is the foundation of bankroll management, determining how much you risk per bet relative to your total betting fund. Professional bettors typically stake 1-5% of their bankroll per bet, with the exact percentage determined by their edge and confidence level.
Stake
Your stake is the money you put on the line—the amount you're willing to lose on a single bet. While everyone focuses on picking winners, professional bettors know that stake sizing is equally important. Bet too much and a losing streak can destroy your bankroll. Bet too little and winning bets don't grow your funds meaningfully. Finding the right stake is the science of balancing growth against risk, and it's often the difference between recreational gamblers and profitable bettors.
Table of Contents
- Understanding Stakes
- Stake vs Return vs Profit
- Staking Methods
- The Unit System
- Stake Sizing Mathematics
- Common Staking Mistakes
- Stake Limits
Understanding Stakes {#understanding}
The stake is simply how much money you put on a bet. Everything else—potential return, profit, risk—flows from this number.
Basic Stake Calculation
Stake Example
| Component | Value |
|---|---|
| Stake | $50 |
| Odds | 2.40 |
| Potential Return | $120 |
| Profit if Win | $70 |
| Loss if Lose | $50 |
Stake vs Return vs Profit {#vs-return}
These terms are often confused:
| Term | Definition | Example (Odds 2.00) |
|---|---|---|
| Stake | Money you bet | $100 |
| Return | Total money back if win | $200 |
| Profit | Return minus stake | $100 |
| Loss | Stake lost if bet fails | $100 |
Why This Matters
Decimal odds of 2.00 show return per unit staked.
- Stake 200 → Profit $100
American odds of +100 show profit per $100 staked.
- Stake 100 → Return $200
Same bet, different perspective.
Staking Methods {#methods}
1. Flat Staking
Same amount on every bet, regardless of odds or confidence.
Example: $20 per bet, every bet
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Simple | Ignores confidence |
| Low variance | Doesn't compound wins |
| Disciplined | May miss value |
Best for: Beginners, recreational bettors
2. Percentage Staking
Fixed percentage of current bankroll.
Example: 2% of bankroll
| Bankroll | 2% Stake |
|---|---|
| $1,000 | $20 |
| $1,200 (after wins) | $24 |
| $800 (after losses) | $16 |
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Automatic adjustment | Recovery slower after losses |
| Protects during downswings | Requires calculation |
| Compounds during upswings |
Best for: Serious bettors, long-term approach
3. Kelly Criterion Staking
Mathematically optimal stake based on edge.
Where:
- p = probability of winning
- q = probability of losing (1-p)
- b = odds - 1
Example: 55% win probability, 2.00 odds
Kelly = (0.55 × 1) - 0.45 / 1 = 0.10 = 10% of bankroll
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Maximizes growth | Requires accurate probabilities |
| Mathematically optimal | High variance |
| Accounts for edge | Easy to overbet |
Best for: Advanced bettors with proven edge
4. Confidence-Based Staking
Variable stakes based on confidence level.
| Confidence | Stake |
|---|---|
| Low | 1 unit |
| Medium | 2 units |
| High | 3 units |
| Very High | 4-5 units |
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Intuitive | Requires accurate self-assessment |
| Flexible | Most bettors overconfident on losses |
| Rewards strong picks | Can encourage overconfidence |
Best for: Experienced bettors with calibrated confidence
The Unit System {#units}
Units standardize stakes across different bankroll sizes.
What Is a Unit?
| Bankroll | 1 Unit |
|---|---|
| $500 | $5 |
| $1,000 | $10 |
| $5,000 | $50 |
| $10,000 | $100 |
Why Use Units?
Communication: "I bet 2 units on Liverpool" works regardless of bankroll size.
Tracking: Results in units allow comparison over time and between bettors.
Discipline: Thinking in units removes emotional attachment to dollars.
Unit Tracking Example
| Date | Bet | Stake | Result | Units +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon | Arsenal | 2u | Win @ 1.85 | +1.7u |
| Tue | Chelsea | 1u | Lose | -1.0u |
| Wed | Liverpool | 3u | Win @ 2.10 | +3.3u |
| Total | +4.0u |
Standard Unit Ranges
| Category | Units per Bet |
|---|---|
| Standard bet | 1-2 units |
| Confident bet | 3 units |
| Very confident | 4-5 units |
| Maximum | Never exceed 5 units |
Stake Sizing Mathematics {#math}
Expected Value and Stakes
Your expected profit from a bet:
Where p = win probability, q = lose probability
Example: 55% chance to win, 2.00 odds, $100 stake
EV = (0.55 × 100) = 45 = +$10
Optimal Stake by Edge
| Your Edge | Recommended Stake |
|---|---|
| 1-2% | 0.5-1 unit |
| 3-5% | 1-2 units |
| 6-10% | 2-3 units |
| 10%+ | 3-5 units |
Stake and Variance
Higher stakes = higher variance in results. Stake size is the primary determinant of risk of ruin—small changes have dramatic effects on survival probability.
Example: 100 bets at 2.00 odds, 52% win rate
| Stake | Expected Profit | Typical Range |
|---|---|---|
| 1 unit | +4 units | -20 to +28 units |
| 3 units | +12 units | -60 to +84 units |
| 5 units | +20 units | -100 to +140 units |
Same edge, wildly different outcomes.
Fractional Kelly
Most professionals use 25-50% of full Kelly to reduce variance:
| Kelly Says | You Bet |
|---|---|
| 10% | 2.5-5% (quarter to half Kelly) |
| 8% | 2-4% |
| 5% | 1.25-2.5% |
Common Staking Mistakes {#mistakes}
Mistake 1: Betting Too Much Per Bet
Problem: Staking 10%+ of bankroll on single bets
Result: Few losing bets can destroy your bankroll
\text{After 5 losses at 10%:} (0.9)^5 = 0.59 = \text{41% of bankroll lost}Solution: Cap individual bets at 5% maximum
Mistake 2: Chasing Losses
Problem: Increasing stakes to recover losses quickly
| Bet | Stake | Result | Bankroll |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $100 | Lose | $900 |
| 2 | $200 | Lose | $700 |
| 3 | $400 | Lose | $300 |
| 4 | $300 | Lose | $0 |
Four bets, bankrupt.
Solution: Stick to your staking plan regardless of recent results
Mistake 3: All-or-Nothing Bets
Problem: "Going all in" on "sure things"
Reality: Nothing is certain in betting. Even 80% favorites lose 20% of the time.
Solution: Never stake more than 5% on any single bet
Mistake 4: Inconsistent Stakes
Problem: 200 on others with no system
Result: Big losses on random high-stake bets
Solution: Use a consistent staking system (flat, percentage, or unit-based)
Mistake 5: Ignoring Odds When Staking
Problem: Same stake on 1.20 favorites and 5.00 longshots
Issue: 100 to win $20. Poor risk/reward.
Solution: Consider odds in stake decisions (Kelly accounts for this automatically)
Stake Limits {#limits}
Bookmaker Stake Limits
| Bookmaker Type | Typical Max Stake |
|---|---|
| Sharp (Pinnacle) | $50,000+ on main markets |
| Standard (Bet365) | 20,000 |
| Soft books | 5,000 |
| After limitation | 50 |
Why Limits Exist
Bookmakers limit:
- Winning bettors
- Sharp money
- Arbitrage bettors
- Bonus abusers
Working Within Limits
| Strategy | Approach |
|---|---|
| Use multiple books | Spread stakes across accounts |
| Round down | 100 looks more recreational |
| Bet different markets | Main lines limited? Try alternatives |
| Accept limitation | Part of the game for winners |
Related Calculators
Plan your stakes:
- Bankroll Management Calculator - Overall strategy
- Kelly Criterion Calculator - Optimal stake sizing
- Stake Calculator - Quick calculations
Frequently Asked Questions
Bonus allocation is limited per region. Claim before capacity runs out.



Related Calculators
Explore More Tools
Put theory into practice with our free calculators.
