> Contents
Heinz vs Super Heinz vs Goliath: Big Bet Guide (2026)
Picture this: it's Saturday afternoon, eight horses you've studied all week are running at three different meets, and your six-fold accumulator just feels too fragile. You know one bad jockey decision kills the whole slip. So you start eyeing the full-cover-no-singles row on the betslip — Heinz, Super Heinz, Goliath — and suddenly £247 looks like a realistic stake instead of a punter's fantasy.
Here's the thing about these three: they're cousins, not twins. A Heinz stitches together 57 bets from 6 selections. A Super Heinz stretches that to 120 bets from 7. A Goliath swallows 247 bets from 8. Same DNA — no singles, every higher combination covered — but the stake scale and bankroll math shift sharply at each step.
This guide walks through the structure of all three, what they actually cost, how many winners you need for profit at realistic odds, and when they beat the alternatives. By the end you'll know which of these three belongs on your slip — and when a Lucky 63 or a plain 8-fold is the smarter call. You can also run any of these live through our universal system bet calculator as you read.
TL;DR — Quick Summary
The three big no-singles bets follow a clean progression. Each step up adds one selection and roughly doubles the bet count.
Side-by-Side Snapshot
| Bet | Selections | Total Bets | £1 Unit Stake | Max Accumulator | Needed to Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heinz | 6 | 57 | £57 | Six-fold | 2 winners (min) |
| Super Heinz | 7 | 120 | £120 | Seven-fold | 2 winners (min) |
| Goliath | 8 | 247 | £247 | Eight-fold | 2 winners (min) |
All three exclude singles — one winner returns zero. At least two selections must come in before you see any money back. The minimum-winner floor is identical; the profit ceiling scales with how many of your picks land.
Bottom line: Heinz = medium ambition, Super Heinz = serious, Goliath = confident-or-crazy. Stake cost grows faster than the selection count because higher-fold accumulators get expensive quickly.
What Heinz, Super Heinz and Goliath Actually Are
All three are full-cover multiples without singles. That means they cover every possible combination of your selections from doubles upward, but they don't include individual single bets.
The No-Singles Family — Why Two Winners Is the Floor
Compare that to their "with singles" siblings. A Lucky 15 has singles on 4 selections. A Lucky 31 and Lucky 63 add singles to 5- and 6-selection bets. Those bets pay out even if only one of your picks wins.
Heinz, Super Heinz and Goliath strip that safety net out. The trade-off is simple: you save 6, 7 or 8 unit stakes by removing singles, but you need at least one winning double before any money comes back. If you're confident enough in your picks that "just one winner" feels like a fluke you'd still consider a loss, the no-singles structure is the right fit. If you want a consolation on a single winner, check our system-bet overview for the full family tree.
Where They Sit in the Full-Cover Progression
Lay out the full no-singles family by selection count and it tells a story:
- Yankee — 4 selections, 11 bets (6D + 4T + 1 four-fold)
- Canadian / Super Yankee — 5 selections, 26 bets
- Heinz — 6 selections, 57 bets
- Super Heinz — 7 selections, 120 bets
- Goliath — 8 selections, 247 bets
Each step adds one more selection and roughly doubles the total bet count. That doubling matters: it's why £1 units feel reasonable on a Yankee (£11) but punishing on a Goliath (£247). The combinatorial explosion kicks in hard above 6 selections.
The Heinz Bet (57 Bets from 6 Selections)
The Heinz is the "entry-level" of the big three — ambitious but still within reach for recreational punters running 10p–50p units.
Bet Breakdown — Every Combination at a Glance
Six selections generate exactly 57 lines across five tiers:
| Combination | Count | What It Means |
|---|---|---|
| Doubles | 15 | Every pair from 6 selections |
| Trebles | 20 | Every triplet |
| Four-folds | 15 | Every quadruplet |
| Five-folds | 6 | Every combination of 5 |
| Six-fold | 1 | All six must win |
| Total | 57 |
You'll see these exact numbers on the betslip summary at any UK bookmaker. They come from the binomial formula C(6,k), which we expand on in how to calculate any system bet.
The £1 Stake Reality Check
At £1 unit stakes, a Heinz is £57. Break that down by what you need to hit to break even at average odds of 2.5 (6/4):
| Winners | Returns (approx.) | Profit vs £57 stake |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | £0 | -£57 (no singles) |
| 2 | £6.25 | -£50.75 |
| 3 | £40.63 | -£16.37 |
| 4 | £163.28 | +£106.28 |
| 5 | £454.30 | +£397.30 |
| 6 | £824.22 | +£767.22 |
Notice the cliff between 3 and 4 winners. Three winners give you 3 doubles and 1 treble (four winning lines). Four winners give you 6 doubles, 4 trebles and 1 four-fold — eleven winning lines. That's where the bet stops bleeding and starts paying.
Where the Name Came From (Trivia)
The H.J. Heinz company ran a "57 Varieties" slogan from 1896 (Henry Heinz reportedly picked the number because he liked how it sounded, not because he actually counted 57 products). UK bookmakers borrowed it in the mid-20th century once the 6-selection no-singles template matched exactly 57 combinations. The ketchup connection makes it easy to remember: Heinz = 57.
The Super Heinz Bet (120 Bets from 7 Selections)
Step up to 7 selections and the bet count more than doubles. Super Heinz is where system betting starts to demand real bankroll management.
Super Heinz Bet Breakdown
| Combination | Count |
|---|---|
| Doubles | 21 |
| Trebles | 35 |
| Four-folds | 35 |
| Five-folds | 21 |
| Six-folds | 7 |
| Seven-fold | 1 |
| Total | 120 |
The doubles-to-four-folds stack is especially deep (21 + 35 + 35 = 91 lines). That's what makes Super Heinz forgiving to the partial-winner case — if you hit four or five of seven at decent odds, the four-folds and five-folds stack compounding returns fast.
The Jump From 6 to 7 — More Than You'd Expect
One extra selection adds 63 new lines (120 − 57 = 63). That's because the seventh pick joins every existing combination AND unlocks the new seven-fold tier. Specifically:
- +6 doubles (pick 7 paired with each of the first 6)
- +15 trebles (pick 7 plus every pair from picks 1–6)
- +20 four-folds
- +15 five-folds
- +6 six-folds (pick 7 plus every five-selection combo)
- +1 seven-fold
If you've ever added "just one more horse" to a bet and wondered why the stake doubled — this is why. Adding a selection doesn't add bets linearly; it multiplies them.
Stake Math at £0.10 to £5 Units
Super Heinz exposure at real-world unit stakes:
| Unit | Total Stake | Break-even winners (at 2.5 avg odds) |
|---|---|---|
| £0.10 | £12 | 4 of 7 |
| £0.25 | £30 | 4 of 7 |
| £0.50 | £60 | 4 of 7 |
| £1 | £120 | 4 of 7 |
| £2 | £240 | 4 of 7 |
| £5 | £600 | 4 of 7 |
Four winners is the realistic break-even line at mid-range odds. Five winners at the same odds returns roughly 4× your stake. Six winners is a proper payday. Seven is what dreams are made of.
The Goliath Bet (247 Bets from 8 Selections)
Goliath is the flagship full-cover-no-singles bet. 247 sub-bets, 8 selections, stakes that look like car payments.
Goliath Bet Breakdown
| Combination | Count |
|---|---|
| Doubles | 28 |
| Trebles | 56 |
| Four-folds | 70 |
| Five-folds | 56 |
| Six-folds | 28 |
| Seven-folds | 8 |
| Eight-fold | 1 |
| Total | 247 |
Those 70 four-folds in the middle of the distribution are where Goliaths earn their keep. Hitting 5 of 8 at 2.5 average odds triggers 10 winning doubles, 10 trebles, 5 four-folds and 1 five-fold — a meaningful return even before the higher-fold fireworks.
Why £1 Goliath Is the Serious Bettor's Bet
A £1 unit Goliath costs £247. Most recreational punters run Goliaths at 10p (£24.70 total) or 25p (£61.75 total) units. Anyone placing genuine £1 Goliaths weekly is either:
- A confident punter with a £10,000+ rolling bankroll who treats Goliath as a small percentage of weekly turnover, or
- An infrequent "big-day" bettor saving up for Cheltenham Festival, Royal Ascot, or a specific football multi-match Saturday.
Both are fine. Neither is casual.
How Many Winners You Actually Need
Goliath break-even at average odds of 2.5 per selection:
| Winners | Winning lines | Approx return | Profit on £247 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 (no singles) | £0 | -£247 |
| 2 | 1 double | £6.25 | -£240.75 |
| 3 | 3D + 1T | £34.38 | -£212.62 |
| 4 | 6D + 4T + 1×4F | £140.63 | -£106.37 |
| 5 | 10D + 10T + 5×4F + 1×5F | £548.05 | +£301.05 |
| 6 | 15D + 20T + 15×4F + 6×5F + 1×6F | £1,814.45 | +£1,567.45 |
| 7 | 21D + 35T + 35×4F + 21×5F + 7×6F + 1×7F | £5,546.88 | +£5,299.88 |
| 8 | all 247 lines | £15,940.49 | +£15,693.49 |
Five winners is the profit floor. Below that you're losing money; at five or above the compounding kicks in ferociously.
Stake Explorer — Pick Your Bet & Unit
See the real cash exposure and how it stacks against your weekly bankroll.
Educational widget. For full return modelling use the universal calculator.
Big-No-Singles vs Big-With-Singles
The alternative to a Heinz or Goliath at the same selection count is a Lucky version (Lucky 63 for 6, an 8-selection "Lucky 255" at some books for 8 — rarer). The trade-off is subtle but important.
Lucky 63 Alternative — When Singles Are Worth the Extra
A Lucky 63 has the same 57 lines as a Heinz plus 6 singles, totaling 63 bets at £63 unit stake. The extra £6 buys you three things:
- Safety net — one winning single returns money (usually 1× odds plus a 5x consolation bonus at many UK bookies)
- Smoother return curve — no cliff between 1 and 2 winners
- All-winner bonus — typically a 25% boost on all-winning Lucky 63s
Read the full comparison in Lucky 31 vs Lucky 63 — same principles apply at the Heinz/Super Heinz scale.
One Winner Changes Everything (With Singles)
Say you pick 6 horses at 3.0 (2/1) and only one wins.
- Heinz result: £0. The whole £57 stake is gone.
- Lucky 63 result: £3 on the single + typical 5x bonus at some bookies ≈ £15 return on £63 stake. Still a loss, but you salvaged some of the stake.
If your picks are genuinely long shots where one winner is plausible and six feels impossible, Lucky 63 is the better structural fit.
Heinz Wins If You Trust All Six (Without Singles)
Flip the scenario: you confidently pick 6 horses at 2.0 (evens) and four win.
- Heinz result (£57 stake): 6D + 4T + 1×4F = £24 + £32 + £16 = £72. Profit £15.
- Lucky 63 result (£63 stake): same 11 winning combination lines (£72) PLUS 4 winning singles (£8) = £80. Profit £17.
Heinz gives you similar profit on a lower stake when you trust every pick. That's the proposition: lower cost, higher break-even demand.
Practical Strategy
Picking the right bet is less about odds math and more about the honest question: how much of your slip do you actually believe in?
When a Heinz Beats an 8-Fold Accumulator
An 8-fold accumulator on the same 6 selections as a Heinz doesn't exist (they'd be a six-fold). But compare a Heinz to a single six-fold on those six selections:
- Six-fold accumulator, £57 stake: one winner loss of any pick = £0. All six win at 2.0 = £3,648.
- Heinz, £57 stake: one pick loss (5 winners) = still £397 profit. All six win = £767 profit.
The six-fold has a far higher ceiling on perfect runs but zero tolerance for a single miss. Heinz trades ceiling for resilience. If your handicapping is 70% across selections, Heinz wins more weeks. If you're chasing a massive long-shot on a specific day, the straight accumulator has more upside for the same stake. Both structures have their place — our parlay calculator helps compare the straight-accumulator side of the math.
Bankroll Rules for Super Heinz and Goliath
Treat Super Heinz and Goliath as stake-intensive bets and apply the standard rule: never more than 1–2% of your weekly bankroll on a single bet slip.
| Weekly bankroll | Max Goliath unit | Max Super Heinz unit |
|---|---|---|
| £500 | £0.02 (£5 Goliath) | £0.04 (£5 Super Heinz) |
| £2,000 | £0.08 (£20 Goliath) | £0.17 (£20 Super Heinz) |
| £10,000 | £0.40 (£100 Goliath) | £0.83 (£100 Super Heinz) |
| £50,000 | £2.00 (£500 Goliath) | £4.17 (£500 Super Heinz) |
If those numbers feel too small: you're being honest with yourself. A £1 unit Goliath when your bankroll is £500 is a 49% exposure on a single Saturday. That's punting, not betting.
The "Just One More Selection" Trap
There's a mental bug that catches casual punters hard: "I've got 5 good picks, I'll add a 6th to make it a Heinz." The problem is that one weak pick contaminates the entire structure. That 6th selection appears in:
- 5 doubles
- 10 trebles
- 10 four-folds
- 5 five-folds
- 1 six-fold
Thirty-one of the 57 Heinz lines depend on your weakest pick winning. If selection 6 has a 30% chance of winning versus 65% for your strong five, you've chopped the expected value of the whole bet. Better to place a Canadian on your 5 strongest picks (26 bets at £26) than a diluted Heinz at £57.
The Math Behind the Bets (Optional)
The Combination Formula — Why 6 → 8 Explodes So Fast
The number of bets in a full-cover-no-singles bet is:
Plain English: for n selections, sum every combination from doubles (k=2) up to the n-fold. The closed form is easier: 2 to the power of n, minus n, minus 1 (to strip out singles and the empty set).
Check it:
- n=6 (Heinz): 2⁶ − 6 − 1 = 64 − 7 = 57 ✅
- n=7 (Super Heinz): 2⁷ − 7 − 1 = 128 − 8 = 120 ✅
- n=8 (Goliath): 2⁸ − 8 − 1 = 256 − 9 = 247 ✅
- n=9 (Super Goliath, rare): 2⁹ − 9 − 1 = 512 − 10 = 502
Every selection you add roughly doubles the count. That's not inflation — it's fundamental combinatorics. Which is why most bookies cap their full-cover menus at Goliath and build anything bigger as a custom system bet via their own calculators or our system bet tool.
FAQ
These are the questions real punters ask about Heinz, Super Heinz and Goliath — pulled directly from Google's People Also Ask and UK bookmaker support traffic. The full answers are in the FAQ block powered by Schema.org markup, which Google uses for rich snippets. For any custom system outside the 6–8 selection range, our free calculator handles up to 20 selections with full stake and return modelling.

