> Contents
18+
A mathematical model that converts tournament chip stacks into real money equity by calculating each player's probability of finishing in each paying position.
What is ICM?
You're on the bubble of a $100,000 tournament. You have 500,000 chips (average stack). Big blind shoves 100,000 chips. You look down at pocket Kings.
In a cash game? Snap call - you're 80% favorite.
In this tournament with ICM? Often fold.
Why? Because those 100,000 chips you risk are worth more in dollars than the 100,000 chips you'd win. Welcome to ICM.
Simple explanation: ICM converts chips into money by recognizing that in tournaments, chips ≠ dollars. Your first chip is worth less than your last chip, and doubling up doesn't double your prize pool equity.
TL;DR - Quick Reference
| Concept | Explanation |
|---|---|
| What ICM is | Model converting chip stacks → dollar equity |
| Key insight | Chips ≠ money in tournaments |
| When it matters most | Final table, bubble, pay jumps |
| Main principle | Survival value > chip accumulation |
| Critical mistake | Playing chip EV instead of $ EV |
| Impact | Can turn +chip EV calls into -$ EV folds |
Bottom line: ICM explains why tight play near the bubble is mathematically correct, not "scared money." It's survival value calculation.
Understanding ICM for Tournament Players
Why Chips Aren't Money
In cash games:
- 100 chips = $100 (always)
- Doubling up = doubling your money
- You can rebuy anytime
- Chip EV = Dollar EV
In tournaments:
- 100 chips might be worth 100, or $200 depending on context
- Doubling up ≠ doubling prize pool equity
- You can't rebuy after elimination
- Chip EV ≠ Dollar EV
The Fundamental ICM Truth
First place gets 40% of prize pool but doesn't need 100% of the chips.
Each additional chip is worth less than the last because:
- You can't win more than first place money
- More chips = higher risk of costly elimination
- Other players also have survival value
The Mathematics of ICM
ICM Equity Curve
How chip percentage translates to prize pool equity (diminishing returns)
💡 Key Insight
With 50% of chips, you don't have 50% equity! ICM shows you have ~43-45% because chips have diminishing value as you accumulate more.
Simplified 3-player ICM model with 50%/30%/20% payout structure. Real tournament ICM is more complex.
Basic ICM Formula (3 Players)
For a player with stack S out of total chips T:
Where probability of finishing 1st is approximately:
But this is simplified. Real ICM uses recursive calculation accounting for all elimination scenarios.
ICM Calculation Example
3 players, $10,000 prize pool (50% / 30% / 20%):
- Player A: 10,000 chips (50%)
- Player B: 6,000 chips (30%)
- Player C: 4,000 chips (20%)
"Chip EV" (wrong) says:
- Player A: $5,000 (50% of chips)
- Player B: $3,000 (30% of chips)
- Player C: $2,000 (20% of chips)
ICM (correct) says:
- **Player A: 5,000!)
- Player B: $3,179
- Player C: $2,438
Why the difference?
- Player A can't win more than $5,000 (1st place) even with all chips
- Player C has "survival value" - they can't finish worse than 3rd ($2,000 guaranteed)
- Player A risks more dollar equity per chip than Player C
Player A has 50% of chips but only 43.8% of prize pool equity. That's ICM pressure.
When ICM Matters Most
1. Tournament Bubble (Pay Jump from $0 to Money)
Scenario: 10 players left, 9 get paid. You're mid-stack.
ICM pressure:
- Massive pay jump (500)
- Short stacks desperate to fold into money
- Big stacks can bully without calling
- Your strategy: Play extremely tight, let short stacks eliminate each other
Example: You have AK, big stack shoves. Normally +EV call. With ICM? Fold - your tournament life is worth more than the chips. The risk premium increases massively at this point.
2. Final Table Bubble
Scenario: 10 players → 9-handed final table with big pay jump.
Similar to money bubble but less extreme. Still significant ICM pressure.
3. Short-Handed Play (3-5 Players)
ICM pressure is maximum at 3-4 players because:
- Large pay jumps between places
- Each decision heavily impacts final placement
- Chip redistribution has huge equity consequences
4. Satellite Tournaments
Everyone who wins gets the same prize (tournament ticket).
ICM strategy: Once you have enough chips to finish top X, fold everything. Additional chips have zero value.
Example: Top 10 get $1,000 ticket. You have 12th biggest stack out of 15 players. Fold every hand until 5 players bust.
ICM Strategy Adjustments
ICM Pressure: Chip EV vs Dollar EV
Diminishing chip value as stack grows (3-player tournament, 50%/30%/20% payout)
Chip EV (Wrong)
50% chips = 50% equity (linear, incorrect)
Dollar EV (Correct)
50% chips ≈ 43-45% equity (ICM adjusted)
Simplified ICM model for 3 players. Real ICM calculations are more complex and account for all stack distributions.
When YOU Have Big Stack
Advantages:
- Apply pressure to medium stacks (they risk more)
- Steal blinds profitably
- Accumulate chips at lower risk
This aggressive play style requires good bankroll management to stay profitable long-term.
Mistakes to avoid: ❌ Don't bully short stacks - they have nothing to lose, will call lighter ❌ Avoid big stack vs. big stack wars - you both risk massive equity ✅ Target medium stacks - they feel maximum ICM pressure
The correct position at the table is crucial for this strategy.
Example: You have 40% of chips, medium stack has 25%, short stack has 10%.
- Shoving into medium stack: High fold equity (they risk ladder position)
- Shoving into short stack: Low fold equity (they're desperate, will call)
When YOU Have Medium Stack
ICM pressure is maximum on YOU.
Strategy:
- Play tighter than chip EV suggests
- Survival > chip accumulation
- Let short stacks and big stacks battle
- Avoid marginal spots
Example: Bubble with AQ offsuit, big stack shoves.
- Chip EV: Probably call (60%+ equity vs. range)
- ICM: Fold - risking your stack is -$EV even if +chip EV
This feels "weak" but is mathematically correct.
When YOU Have Short Stack
ICM pressure is LOWEST on you - paradoxically, this means aggression.
Why:
- You can't fall much further in payout
- Big/medium stacks don't want to call and eliminate you
- Your fold equity is massive
Strategy:
- Push/fold aggressively with strong all-in decisions
- Wider shoving ranges than chip EV
- Force big/medium stacks into ICM-punished calls
- Understand your pot odds to find optimal push ranges
Example: You have 8BB on bubble, Button with K9o.
- Chip EV: Marginal push
- ICM: Clear push - big blind faces ICM suicide to call even with AJ
Common ICM Mistakes
Mistake #1: Calling Too Wide on the Bubble
❌ Wrong: "I have AK, I have to call this shove!"
✅ Right: "I have AK with 20BB. Big stack shoved. Calling risks my tournament life for a min-cash difference. Fold."
Why it's wrong: Even premium hands can be ICM folds when:
- You're mid-stack on bubble
- Pay jump is large
- You have comfortable stack to fold into money
ICM Trainer Lesson: Run this scenario in the ICM Trainer - you'll see AK is often a fold.
Mistake #2: Playing Chip EV vs. Short Stacks
❌ Wrong: "I have 50% of chips, I can bully the 5BB short stack with any two cards."
✅ Right: "Short stack will call very wide (ICM pressure low on them). I need actual equity to justify aggression."
Why it's wrong: Short stacks have the least ICM pressure. They'll call your bluffs because they can't fall much further in payouts.
Mistake #3: Big Stack vs. Big Stack Wars
❌ Wrong: "I'll battle this other big stack for dominance!"
✅ Right: "We're both risking massive dollar equity. Unless I have the nuts, I'll let them battle medium/short stacks instead."
Why it's wrong: Two big stacks fighting gifts equity to the rest of the field. The loser falls from ~30% equity to ~15% equity in one hand.
ICM Rule: Avoid confrontation with comparable or larger stacks unless you have monster hands.
Mistake #4: Not Adjusting to Short Stack Desperation
❌ Wrong: "I'm the big stack on the bubble, I can shove any two cards and everyone folds."
✅ Right: "Medium stacks will fold a lot (high ICM pressure), but short stacks will call wide (low ICM pressure). I need to adjust my shoving range accordingly."
Reality: Short stacks on bubble call wider than chip EV because they're already near minimum payout.
ICM Chops (Deal-Making)
When final table players agree to split the prize pool, ICM determines fair splits.
Example: 3-Way Chop
$10,000 prize pool (50%/30%/20%):
- Player A: 12,000 chips
- Player B: 5,000 chips
- Player C: 3,000 chips
"Equal chop" (wrong): $3,333 each
"Chip chop" (wrong):
- Player A: $6,000 (60% of chips)
- Player B: $2,500 (25% of chips)
- Player C: $1,500 (15% of chips)
ICM chop (correct):
- Player A: $4,891
- Player B: $2,986
- Player C: $2,123
Why ICM chop is fair: It accounts for payout structure, not just chip distribution. Player A has chip lead but can't win 60% of prize pool (max is 50% = 1st place).
Use an ICM calculator to negotiate fair deals. Don't accept chip chops - they favor big stacks unfairly.
ICM vs. Chip EV: Decision Examples
Scenario 1: Bubble Call Decision
Setup:
- 11 players left, top 10 paid ($500 min cash)
- You have 300,000 chips (2nd place)
- Short stack (100,000) shoves UTG
- You have AK in big blind
Chip EV: Clear call (AK vs. UTG range = ~63% equity)
ICM Analysis:
- If you call and lose: Drop to ~10th place, might not cash
- If you fold: Almost guaranteed cash by outlasting shorter stacks
- Dollar risk: ~$500 (cashing vs. not)
- Dollar gain: ~$200 (improving ladder position)
ICM Decision: FOLD
This feels insane, but the math is clear - you risk more in bubble/ladder value than you gain in chip EV.
Scenario 2: Final Table Push
Setup:
- 4 players left, payouts: 6,000/2,000
- You: 600,000 chips (25%)
- Villain: 1,200,000 chips (50%)
- You have QQ on button
Chip EV: Shove (QQ crushes button opening range)
ICM Analysis:
- You have $4,200 ICM equity currently
- If you lose all-in: Drop to $2,000 (4th place)
- If you double: Increase to ~$5,500 ICM equity
- Risk: 4,200 - $2,000)
- Gain: 5,500 - $4,200)
Risk-reward ratio: Risk 1,300 = need 62.9% equity (not just 50%)
Against villain's calling range, do you have 63%+? Depends on villain's ICM awareness.
If villain knows ICM: They call tighter, you can shove wider. If villain is ICM-unaware: They call chip-EV, you should tighten.
Related Concepts
- Equity: ICM modifies hand equity calculations. A hand with 70% chip equity might have 55% dollar equity due to ICM pressure.
- Tournament Strategy: ICM is the mathematical foundation of tournament poker strategy. Every final table decision should consider ICM.
- Expected Value (EV): In tournaments, chip EV ≠ dollar EV. ICM bridges this gap by calculating $ EV from chip stacks.
- Pot Odds: Traditional pot odds assume chip EV. ICM-adjusted pot odds account for survival value and pay jumps.
- Bubble Play: The bubble is the most extreme ICM scenario. Understanding ICM is essential for profitable bubble play.
Practical Tools
ICM Calculators and Trainers
- ICM Trainer - Interactive ICM scenarios with instant feedback
- Equity Calculator - Calculate hand vs. range equity, then adjust for ICM
- Tournament Calculator - Full tournament simulations with ICM modeling
- Push-Fold Calculator - ICM-adjusted push/fold charts for short stack play
ICM Training Plan
Week 1: Basics
- Understand why chips ≠ money
- Run 3-player ICM scenarios
- Practice bubble fold decisions
Week 2: Application
- Final table simulations in ICM Trainer
- Identify when to deviate from chip EV
- Study big stack, medium stack, short stack strategies
Week 3: Advanced
- ICM-adjusted hand ranges
- Deal-making calculations
- Exploitative ICM adjustments
Key Takeaways
- ✅ Chips ≠ Dollars - First chip worth less than last chip due to payout structure
- ✅ Bubble is extreme ICM - Massive pay jumps create counter-intuitive folds
- ✅ Stack size determines strategy - Big/medium/short stacks have different ICM pressures
- ✅ AK can be a fold - Even premium hands are ICM folds in high-pressure spots
- ✅ Short stacks are aggressive - Low ICM pressure allows wider shoving
- ✅ Medium stacks are tight - Maximum ICM pressure forces cautious play
- ✅ Use ICM for deals - Don't accept chip chops, demand ICM-fair splits
Remember: Learning ICM separates good tournament players from great ones. Master it, and you'll win 20-30% more in tournaments by avoiding costly ICM mistakes.
FAQ
When should I start thinking about ICM?
ICM becomes relevant when pay jumps are significant:
- Early tournament: Ignore ICM, play chip EV (pay jumps are tiny)
- Near bubble: Start considering ICM (large $0 → min cash jump)
- Final 2 tables: ICM is critical (every elimination = big pay jump)
- Final table: ICM dominates all decisions (except heads-up)
Rule of thumb: If busting costs you more than one buy-in worth of ladder money, use ICM.
How do I calculate ICM during a hand?
You don't. ICM calculations are too complex for real-time mental math.
Instead:
- Study ICM concepts beforehand
- Use ICM Trainer to build intuition
- Memorize common scenarios (bubble folds, short stack shoves)
- Apply heuristics at the table
Heuristics:
- Bubble/final table? Tighten medium stacks, loosen short stacks
- Big pay jump? Value survival over chip accumulation
- Short stack shoves? They're likely shoving wider than chip EV
Can ICM tell me to fold pocket Aces?
Yes, but extremely rarely.
Scenario where AA is an ICM fold:
- You're 2nd in chips on bubble with comfortable stack
- Big stack shoves (covering you)
- Short stack is all-in separately
- If you fold, short stack likely busts, you cash
Math: Your tournament life is worth more than the chip EV of calling with AA, because you're almost guaranteed to cash by folding.
This happens <0.1% of the time. Don't look for AA folds - look for AQ, AJ, small pairs where ICM folds are common.
How does ICM affect heads-up play?
ICM becomes irrelevant heads-up because:
- Only two payout spots left (1st and 2nd)
- Chip EV = Dollar EV (doubling up = moving from 2nd to 1st)
- No ladder/bubble considerations
Heads-up strategy: Ignore ICM, play chip EV. Aggression and reads matter, not ICM pressure.
Should I take an ICM chop or play it out?
Depends on your edge:
Take the chop if:
- You're less skilled than opponents
- You're tired / not playing your best
- ICM value is higher than your expected value playing out
Play it out if:
- You have skill edge over opponents
- You're in great mental state
- Opponents are ICM-unaware (you can exploit)
Example: ICM chop offers you 8,000 (1st) + 70% chance of $3,000 (average of 2nd/3rd):
EV = 0.30 \times 8000 + 0.70 \times 3000 = 2400 + 2100 = $4,500
You should play it out (expected 4,000 chop).
How does variance factor into ICM?
ICM assumes zero variance (infinite sample). In reality:
- Short sample (1 tournament): High variance, ICM suggests cautious play
- Long sample (100+ tournaments): Lower variance, can take more ICM-negative risks for chip accumulation
Bankroll management rule: If you're playing above your bankroll level, lean more conservative than ICM suggests. ICM calculates this tournament's EV, not your bankroll's survival.
Use the Bankroll Calculator to determine how many buy-ins you need to comfortably play tournament stakes.
Final Thought: ICM is the single most important concept separating amateur from professional tournament poker. Study it, practice it with the ICM Trainer, and watch your tournament ROI increase by 20-30%. The math doesn't lie.
Bonus allocation is limited per region. Claim before capacity runs out.




Related Terms
Explore More Tools
Put theory into practice with our free calculators.
