> Contents
18+
Dirty Diaper Poker Hand: What Is It & Why It's Famous (2026)
Picture this: it's Day 4 of the 2021 WSOP Main Event. Nicholas Rigby — a Pittsburgh poker player known for playing every hand like he's got aces — looks down at 3♣2♠. The absolute bottom of the barrel. His opponent shows pocket kings. Rigby doesn't care. He fires three barrels, shoves all-in on the river, and his opponent folds. The table erupts. PokerGo's clip title says it all: "Most Reckless Bluff in World Series of Poker History."
That hand — 3-2 offsuit — earned Rigby the nickname "Dirty Diaper." And in 2026, it's become one of the most searched poker hand nicknames in the game. Not because 3-2 is good (it's literally the worst starting hand in Texas Hold'em), but because one player turned garbage into gold on the biggest stage in poker.
This article breaks down everything: what the Dirty Diaper actually is, why 3-2 offsuit is mathematically worse than every other hand, Rigby's legendary moments, and a free calculator to see the odds yourself.
TL;DR — The Dirty Diaper Hand at a Glance
Key Numbers You Need to Know
| Fact | Value |
|---|---|
| What is the Dirty Diaper? | 3-2 offsuit — any three + two of different suits |
| Win rate vs random hand | ~31.1% (lowest of any starting hand) |
| Named after | Nicholas "Dirty Diaper" Rigby |
| Famous moment | 2021 WSOP — bluffed pocket kings off the pot |
| Worse than 7-2 offsuit? | Yes — 31.1% vs 33.4% equity |
| Only straight possible | A-2-3-4-5 (the wheel) |
| Straight flush in 2024 | Rigby hit 3-2 suited straight flush at WSOP Event #5 |
| Should you play it? | Almost never — fold pre-flop 99%+ of the time |
Now you know the headline numbers. The rest of this article explains why 3-2 is the worst, how Rigby made it famous, and when (if ever) you might consider playing it.
What Is the Dirty Diaper Hand in Poker?
3-2 Offsuit: The Worst Starting Hand Explained
The Dirty Diaper is 3-2 offsuit — a three and a two of different suits (like 3♣2♠ or 3♥2♦). In Texas Hold'em, where you receive two hole cards before the community board, this is the statistical basement.
Here's why it's worse than any other starting hand:
- Lowest combined rank — 3 and 2 are the two lowest non-paired cards possible. Even 4-2 offsuit has a slight edge because the 4 can make one additional straight (A-2-3-4-5 and 2-3-4-5-6).
- Only one straight — 3-2 can only make A-2-3-4-5 (the "wheel"). Compare that to a hand like 8-7 suited, which can participate in four different straights.
- No high card value — If everyone misses the board, your 3-high doesn't beat anything. Even 7-2 offsuit has a 7 that can occasionally win at showdown.
- Offsuit kills flush potential — Without suited cards, you can't even hope for a backdoor flush draw.
In raw equity against a random hand, 3-2 offsuit wins just 31.1% of the time. That's the worst number you'll find on any poker equity chart.
Why "Dirty Diaper"? The Origin of the Name
The nickname comes from Nicholas Rigby, a Pittsburgh-based poker player who earned the moniker "Dirty Diaper" during the 2021 WSOP Main Event. Rigby's style was the opposite of textbook poker — he played hands that nobody in their right mind would enter a pot with, including 3-2 offsuit repeatedly.
The name itself is a reference to what you're holding: something messy, stinky, and something you'd normally throw away as fast as possible. That's 3-2 offsuit in a nutshell.
Before Rigby, 3-2 offsuit didn't have a widely recognized nickname like 7-2 (The Hammer) or Q-7 (The Computer Hand). Rigby's viral moments at the WSOP gave it an identity — and now "Dirty Diaper" is used in poker commentary, Reddit threads, and strategy articles worldwide.
How 3-2 Compares in the Hand Rankings Hierarchy
To understand just how bad the Dirty Diaper is, here's where 3-2 offsuit sits relative to other unpaired starting hands:
| Hand | Nickname | Win Rate vs Random | Straights Possible |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-2o | Dirty Diaper | 31.1% | 1 (wheel only) |
| 7-2o | The Hammer | 33.4% | 1 |
| 8-3o | — | 33.7% | 1 |
| 4-2o | — | 31.8% | 1 |
| 3-2s | — | 34.2% | 1 |
| 7-2s | — | 35.4% | 1 |
| A-K s | Big Slick | 67.0% | 4 |
| A-A | Pocket Rockets | 85.3% | — |
The bottom line: 3-2 offsuit is mathematically the worst starting hand you can be dealt in Texas Hold'em. Not 7-2 — that one's slightly better. The Dirty Diaper holds the actual nut low crown.
How to Play the Dirty Diaper Hand
When Does 3-2 Have Straight Potential?
The only straight 3-2 can complete is the wheel: A-2-3-4-5. This is the lowest possible straight, which means even when you hit it, anyone with 2-3-4-5-6 or higher beats you.
Here's the straight draw math:
- Flopping an open-ended draw (needing A-4 or 4-5 on the flop): approximately 1.3% of flops
- Flopping the wheel directly (A-4-5 on the flop): approximately 0.3%
- Completing a wheel by the river (when you flop a draw): roughly 32% with two cards to come
Compare that to a hand like J-10 suited, which can make four different straights and regularly flops open-ended draws (~10% of flops). The Dirty Diaper's straight potential is almost non-existent.
Should You Ever Play 3-2 Offsuit?
In nearly every situation, the correct play is to fold 3-2 offsuit immediately. Here are the few exceptions where it's technically defensible:
Free Flops in the Big Blind
If everyone folds or limps to your big blind and there's no raise, you see the flop for free. You're already invested — there's no additional cost. Even then, proceed with extreme caution post-flop. Your hand can only improve to the wheel straight, and any pair you make (threes or twos) is the lowest possible pair.
Blind-vs-Blind Steal Attempts
In tournament poker with antes, if it folds to the small blind and you're in the big blind, defending 3-2 against a wide small blind range can be marginally profitable — not because your hand is good, but because your opponent is also playing junk. Check your implied odds before committing chips.
The "Dirty Diaper Challenge" (Entertainment Only)
Some players, inspired by Rigby, play 3-2 for fun or as a side bet. This is a -EV play by definition. If you want to try it, keep your bankroll management tight and treat it as entertainment spending, not a strategy.
Dirty Diaper Strategy: When Bluffing Makes Sense
Rigby's success with 3-2 wasn't about the cards — it was about the bluff. Here's when a Dirty Diaper bluff can actually work:
- Dry board texture — Boards like K-8-2 rainbow give you bottom pair (twos) and your opponent likely has nothing. A continuation bet often takes it down.
- Scare cards on the turn/river — If an ace or a king comes and you've been representing strength, your opponent might fold middle pairs.
- Against tight, cautious players — Players who respect your raises and can fold decent hands are ideal bluff targets. Against calling stations, 3-2 is pure garbage.
- Stack leverage in tournaments — When you have a big stack and your opponent is short, the threat of elimination adds fold equity independent of your cards.
The key insight: bluffs don't need good cards — they need good stories. If your betting pattern tells a convincing story (like representing top pair or an overpair), your opponent doesn't know you have 3-2. That's exactly what Rigby understood.
Worst Poker Hands: Win Rate Comparison
Pre-flop equity against a random hand in Texas Hold'em. The Dirty Diaper (3-2 offsuit) sits at the very bottom with 31.1% — even below the famous Hammer (7-2 offsuit).
Equity percentages based on Monte Carlo simulations with 1M+ hands against a single random opponent. Actual results vary with number of opponents and board texture.
Dirty Diaper vs Other Bad Poker Hands
3-2 vs 7-2 (The Hammer): Which Is Worse?
For years, poker culture declared 7-2 offsuit "the worst hand in poker." There's even a popular side bet — "The Hammer" — where you get paid by everyone at the table if you win a pot with 7-2. But is it actually the worst?
No. 3-2 offsuit is worse. Here's the comparison:
| Metric | 3-2 Offsuit (Dirty Diaper) | 7-2 Offsuit (The Hammer) |
|---|---|---|
| Equity vs random | 31.1% | 33.4% |
| High card value | 3 (nearly worthless) | 7 (wins against 6-high and below) |
| Straights possible | 1 (A-2-3-4-5) | 1 (3-4-5-6-7) |
| Pair strength | Pair of 3s or 2s (bottom pair almost always) | Pair of 7s (can beat some boards) |
| Cultural status | Rising (since 2021) | Legendary ("The Hammer" challenge) |
7-2 offsuit has been called the worst for decades partly because of tradition and partly because of the 7-2 challenge in home games and poker vlogs. But the math clearly shows 3-2 offsuit is the true nut low of Texas Hold'em.
Other Notorious Bad Hands and Poker Nicknames
The Dirty Diaper and The Hammer aren't alone at the bottom. Here are other infamous hands and their nicknames:
- The Gimp (various) — Typically refers to 3-2 or other bottom-tier hands. Usage varies by poker room.
- The Devil's Hand (pocket 6s + a 6 on board) — When trip sixes appear (6-6-6), it's called the Devil's Hand. Not a starting hand nickname per se, but a memorable board situation.
- Jack Shit (J-2) — You have a jack and... well, nothing useful with it.
- The Beer Hand (7-2) — Another name for The Hammer, implying you should be drinking rather than playing it.
- The Computer Hand (Q-7) — Early poker simulations showed Q-7 offsuit wins exactly ~50% against a random hand, so it became "the computer hand."
If you're interested in how these hand rankings work mathematically, including rare collisions like quad aces vs royal flushes, we have a deep breakdown with probability charts.
Nut Low in Different Poker Variants
The concept of "worst hand" changes depending on what game you're playing:
| Variant | Worst Starting Hand | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Texas Hold'em | 3-2 offsuit | Lowest equity against random hands |
| Omaha Hi | 2-2-3-3 rainbow | Four low cards, no suits, dominated by everything |
| Omaha Hi-Lo | K-K-J-9 rainbow | Great for hi in theory, but can't compete for low at all and often loses to better hi hands |
| 7-Card Stud | 2-3-7 rainbow (first three) | No straight potential, no flush potential, no high cards |
| Short Deck (6+) | 6-7 offsuit | Lowest possible cards in the short deck format |
In every format, the pattern is the same: low disconnected cards with no suit coordination = garbage. The Dirty Diaper just happens to be the ultimate expression of that principle in Hold'em.
Famous Dirty Diaper Moments in Poker History
2021 WSOP Main Event: Rigby Bluffs Pocket Kings
This is the hand that started it all. During Day 4 of the 2021 WSOP Main Event, Nicholas Rigby picked up 3♣2♠ and decided to play it aggressively.
| Stage | Action |
|---|---|
| Rigby's hand | 3♣2♠ (Dirty Diaper) |
| Opponent's hand | K♣K♠ (pocket kings) |
| Pre-flop | Rigby raises, opponent calls |
| Flop | Low/medium board — Rigby continuation bets |
| Turn | Rigby fires again (second barrel) |
| River | Rigby shoves all-in (third barrel) |
| Result | Opponent folds pocket kings. Rigby wins. |
The key: Rigby's consistent aggression told a story his opponent believed. By the river, the opponent faced a huge bet and concluded Rigby must have a strong hand. Classic pot-committed fear in reverse — the opponent wasn't willing to call off his stack with "just" kings.
PokerGo titled the clip "Most Reckless Bluff in World Series of Poker History" and it went viral with millions of views. Rigby embraced the Dirty Diaper identity, and the nickname stuck permanently.
2024 WSOP Event #5: The Dirty Diaper Straight Flush
Three years later, Rigby did something even more improbable. During WSOP 2024 Event #5, he was dealt 3-2 suited — the slightly-less-terrible cousin of the Dirty Diaper. This time, the board cooperated:
The community cards delivered a straight flush: A-4-5 of the same suit as his 3-2. Rigby had made a straight flush with the Dirty Diaper hand.
PokerNews ran the story under the headline "Rigby Hits Dirty Diaper Straight Flush." The poker world collectively lost it. The odds of making a straight flush with any specific suited hand are roughly 1 in 72,000 deals — and Rigby did it with the hand he's literally famous for playing.
Why Rigby's Play Went Viral
Rigby's moments hit different from a standard poker highlight for three reasons:
- The hand is objectively terrible — Everyone knows 3-2 is the worst hand. That's what makes the bluff so shocking and the straight flush so funny.
- The stakes were real — The WSOP Main Event isn't a home game. These are buy-ins in the thousands, against some of the best players in the world. Running a triple-barrel bluff with 3-2 at that level is insane.
- The nickname is perfect — "Dirty Diaper" is memorable, visual, and funny. It's the kind of name that sticks in your brain and makes you want to watch the clip again.
Rigby turned himself into a poker personality with nothing more than the worst hand in the game and an uncommon amount of courage. That's a story the internet loves.
The Math Behind 3-2 Offsuit (2026)
Pre-Flop Equity Against Common Hands
Here's how 3-2 offsuit performs against hands you'll actually face at the table:
| Opponent's Hand | 3-2 Offsuit Equity | Opponent's Equity |
|---|---|---|
| A-A | 12.5% | 87.5% |
| K-K | 16.8% | 83.2% |
| A-K suited | 32.7% | 67.3% |
| J-10 suited | 34.1% | 65.9% |
| 8-8 | 18.2% | 81.8% |
| 7-6 suited | 37.4% | 62.6% |
| Random hand | 31.1% | 68.9% |
Against premium hands, 3-2 offsuit is essentially drawing dead — a less than 1 in 5 chance. Even against medium-strength hands, you're a significant underdog. The only scenario where 3-2 is close to competitive is against another junk hand.
This is why professional players fold 3-2 offsuit without a second thought. The expected value is deeply negative against any reasonable range of hands your opponents might play. Running these numbers through a variance simulator shows consistent losses over any sample size.
Straight and Flush Potential: The Numbers
In plain language: the chance that the flop comes A-4-5 (the only cards that give you a straight) is about 1 in 300 flops. And even when you hit the wheel, you can still lose to a higher straight (2-3-4-5-6).
For straight draws:
- Open-ended draw on the flop (needing one card on each side): ~1.3% of flops
- Gutshot draw on the flop (needing one specific middle card): ~2.8% of flops
Compare this to a hand like 8-7 suited, which flops an open-ended straight draw about 10% of the time and has flush potential. The Dirty Diaper's straight potential is roughly 8 times worse than a decent connected hand.
FAQ: The Dirty Diaper Poker Hand
This section answers the 15 most searched questions about the Dirty Diaper hand, from basic definitions to advanced strategy. For deeper analysis of poker hand rankings and probabilities, explore our poker calculators including the pot odds calculator and outs calculator. You can also read about Mississippi Stud strategy, the Cajun Stud poker rules, or how Triple Double Bonus Poker changes betting system math. For understanding randomness and probability in gambling, see our analysis of losing streaks — or explore how even impossible-seeming events like perfect brackets compare to poker probabilities.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bonus allocation is limited per region. Claim before capacity runs out.





