BETTING / GROWTH PROJECTIONS
Bankroll Growth Calculator(2026)
Plot 100 simulated bankroll trajectories, estimate time-to-target, and see how compounding compares to flat staking over your full horizon.

Demo scenarios
Three realistic compounding profiles you can tune from
1-2% safe, 3-5% aggressive
Break-even win rate: 51.3%
Edge per bet: +7.25%
Goal: $2000.00
Enter parameters to run the simulation
Six steps from inputs to plan
The same workflow we use to plan our own bankroll-growth strategies.
Determine your starting bankroll
Use only money you can afford to lose entirely. Separate it from rent, savings, or living expenses.
Estimate your edge realistically
If you don't track Closing-Line Value or have 1,000+ bets of history, assume your edge is 0 until proven.
Choose a sizing method
Flat 1-2% works for most. Fractional Kelly (1/4 or 1/2) for advantage players with verified edge.
Set your time horizon and target
Pick a realistic horizon (1, 3, 5, or 10 years) and a multiplier target (2x, 5x, 10x).
Review the projected trajectory
Look at the median path, the 5th-95th band, and the worst-case drawdown. Be ready for the bottom of the cone.
Save your plan and re-evaluate
Export the plan, re-check edge and CLV every 500-1,000 bets, adjust if conditions shift.
What this calculator actually computes
The math behind the chart, with no marketing fluff. If something here doesn't make sense, the calc isn't wrong — the assumption you brought to it probably is.
What this calculator computes
Each Monte Carlo path is a random walk with edge: at every step, win probability p moves your bankroll by stake × (odds-1), and (1-p) moves it by -stake. Compound mode rescales stake = bankroll × unit%. Flat mode keeps stake = starting × unit%. Run 100 paths, take percentiles. That's it.
Why growth strategies fail
Three failure modes dominate: edge erosion (lines move against you, sharps copy your angle), over-staking (5%+ units feel fine until you hit the 95th-percentile drawdown), and emotional sizing (chasing losses, doubling on tilt). Variance you can survive. The other three you can't.
When compounding makes sense
Compounding wins when (a) your edge is real and stable, (b) your psychology can handle 30-50% drawdowns from peak, and (c) you have time horizons measured in years not weeks. If any of those is shaky, flat staking is safer — slower but harder to ruin.
Pair this with the rest of the toolkit
Each tool answers a different bankroll question. Use them together for a complete plan.
Bankroll Calculator (universal)
Universal sizing for sports, blackjack, poker, and video poker. Risk of ruin, units, Kelly modes.
Kelly Criterion Calculator
Compute the mathematically optimal stake for any edge + odds combination.
Risk of Ruin Calculator
Model the probability of going broke given your bankroll, unit size, and edge.
Staking Plan Calculator
Compare flat, percentage, Kelly, and unit-based staking plans on identical inputs.
Bankroll growth — frequently asked questions
Related guides
Articles that pair with this calculator's projections.
Bankroll Growth vs Flat Staking
Side-by-side comparison: when each approach wins, with concrete bankroll trajectories.
What is Bankroll Management?
The core concept: why a bankroll exists, how it differs from gambling money, and the rules that protect it.
How to Calculate Bankroll Units
Convert your bankroll to bet units the right way — flat, percentage, and Kelly-based methods.
Bankroll Management for Sports Betting
Sport-specific bankroll rules: parlays, live betting, and game-by-game volatility.
Bankroll Calculator vs Kelly
When to use straight bankroll sizing and when Kelly's optimal-growth math is the right tool.
Blog Article
Blog Article
Blog Article
Blog Article
Blog Article