ToolsGambling
TG

BETTING / GROWTH PROJECTIONS

Bankroll Growth Calculator(2026)

Plot 100 simulated bankroll trajectories, estimate time-to-target, and see how compounding compares to flat staking over your full horizon.

Universal bankroll planning?
This calculator is focused. For full bankroll planning across sports, blackjack, poker and video poker — with Monte Carlo simulation, multi-strategy comparison and risk-of-ruin live — see our Bankroll Calculator
100MC paths
10Kmax bets
100%free
Built by Evgeniy VolkovUpdated April 2026
Evgeniy Volkov
Evgeniy VolkovSenior iGaming Software Engineer
Real Monte Carlo, not approximationsCompound vs flat side-by-sideOpen math, no hidden fees
Read methodology

Demo scenarios

Three realistic compounding profiles you can tune from

growth-calc.sys1,000 bets · 100 sims
%

1-2% safe, 3-5% aggressive

Break-even win rate: 51.3%

%

Edge per bet: +7.25%

Goal: $2000.00

Enter parameters to run the simulation

How the projection works

Six steps from inputs to plan

The same workflow we use to plan our own bankroll-growth strategies.

01

Determine your starting bankroll

Use only money you can afford to lose entirely. Separate it from rent, savings, or living expenses.

02

Estimate your edge realistically

If you don't track Closing-Line Value or have 1,000+ bets of history, assume your edge is 0 until proven.

03

Choose a sizing method

Flat 1-2% works for most. Fractional Kelly (1/4 or 1/2) for advantage players with verified edge.

04

Set your time horizon and target

Pick a realistic horizon (1, 3, 5, or 10 years) and a multiplier target (2x, 5x, 10x).

05

Review the projected trajectory

Look at the median path, the 5th-95th band, and the worst-case drawdown. Be ready for the bottom of the cone.

06

Save your plan and re-evaluate

Export the plan, re-check edge and CLV every 500-1,000 bets, adjust if conditions shift.

Compounding math, plain language

What this calculator actually computes

The math behind the chart, with no marketing fluff. If something here doesn't make sense, the calc isn't wrong — the assumption you brought to it probably is.

What this calculator computes

Each Monte Carlo path is a random walk with edge: at every step, win probability p moves your bankroll by stake × (odds-1), and (1-p) moves it by -stake. Compound mode rescales stake = bankroll × unit%. Flat mode keeps stake = starting × unit%. Run 100 paths, take percentiles. That's it.

Why growth strategies fail

Three failure modes dominate: edge erosion (lines move against you, sharps copy your angle), over-staking (5%+ units feel fine until you hit the 95th-percentile drawdown), and emotional sizing (chasing losses, doubling on tilt). Variance you can survive. The other three you can't.

When compounding makes sense

Compounding wins when (a) your edge is real and stable, (b) your psychology can handle 30-50% drawdowns from peak, and (c) you have time horizons measured in years not weeks. If any of those is shaky, flat staking is safer — slower but harder to ruin.

FAQ

Bankroll growth — frequently asked questions

Flat staking uses a fixed unit size — say $20 per bet — regardless of how your bankroll changes. Compounding scales the unit with your bankroll: at +50% bankroll, your unit is +50%. Compounding accelerates growth at the cost of bigger drawdowns.
A common rule is at every +25% bankroll milestone — re-baseline your unit on the new total. Below $1,000 starting bankrolls, wait for +50% before re-sizing to avoid jumpy stakes from variance.
At a 1% edge with 2% units, the median path doubles in roughly 3,500 bets — about 3 years at 1,000 bets per year. The 5th-percentile path may take 8,000+ bets. Variance dominates short horizons.
5-15% annual growth on a verified edge is realistic. Tools or services promising 50%+ monthly growth are either taking dangerous full-Kelly risk or misrepresenting variance. Compound growth is slow but durable.
A mixed approach is healthiest: compound until you hit a milestone (+50%, +100%), then withdraw 25-30% of profits and let the rest compound. This banks real money while preserving growth.
Even with a clear edge, real paths swing wildly. The 5th-95th percentile cone in our chart shows the realistic range. Two bettors with the same edge and same plan can land 3-5x apart over 1,000 bets purely from variance.
A genuine +1% edge is enough to grow long-term. Below +0.5%, the bookmaker's vig and your variance will dominate. Most retail bettors don't have a real edge — they're paying ~5% on every bet and don't notice.
Three reasons: negative true edge after vig, over-staking (5%+ units when 1-2% is correct), and emotional bet sizing (chasing losses, doubling on tilt). The math punishes all three quickly.
Full Kelly often suggests 5-10% units on small edges, but full Kelly maximizes growth at the cost of brutal drawdowns (50%+ is normal). Most professionals use 1/4 to 1/2 Kelly for psychological survival.
Track Closing-Line Value (CLV). If your average odds beat closing odds by 1-2%+, you have a real edge. ROI alone is noisy — 500 bets with +5% ROI can come from luck or skill. CLV separates them.
Edges decay. Sharps copy your angles, books adjust lines, public catches on. Re-evaluate your edge every 500-1,000 bets. If CLV drops below +1%, your edge is gone — stop scaling units up.
Not if your process is sound. Drawdowns of 30-50% from peak are normal at 2-5% Kelly. If the drawdown comes from edge erosion (CLV gone), pause and rebuild. If it's variance, hold the line.
The universal Bankroll Calculator sizes your unit and shows risk of ruin for any sport or game. This tool is narrower — it projects how compounding (or flat) plays out over a long horizon, with side-by-side comparisons.
Run the calc with one stake setting, save it via 'Save snapshot,' then change the stake percent and re-run. The history log shows every snapshot — compare median final bankroll, target probability, and bust rate.